New Mexico 2025 2025 Regular Session

New Mexico Senate Bill SB39 Introduced / Fiscal Note

Filed 02/19/2025

                     
 
Fiscal impact reports (FIRs) are prepared by the Legislative Finance Committee (LFC) for standing finance 
committees of the Legislature. LFC does not assume responsibility for the accuracy of these reports if they 
are used for other purposes. 
 
F I S C A L    I M P A C T    R E P O R T 
 
 
SPONSOR 
Sens. Stefanics, Stewart and Hamblen/ 
Rep. Szczepanski 
LAST UPDATED 
ORIGINAL DATE 2/19/2025 
 
SHORT TITLE Add Classes to Prior Authorization Drugs 
BILL 
NUMBER Senate Bill 39 
  
ANALYST Esquibel 
  
  
  
ESTIMATED ADDITIONAL OPERATING BUDGET IMPACT* 
(dollars in thousands) 
Agency/Program 
FY25 FY26 FY27 
3 Year 
Total Cost 
Recurring or 
Nonrecurring 
Fund 
Affected 
NMPSIA  $950.0 $1,000.0 $1,950.0 	Recurring NMPSIA Fund 
RHCA  $2,193.0 $2,302.0 $4,49	5.0 Recurring RHCA Fund 
State Health 
Benefit Plan 
 
See Fiscal 
Implications 
See Fiscal 
Implications 
See Fiscal 
Implications 
Recurring SHBP Fund 
Total  $3,143.0 $3,302.0 $6,	445.0 Recurring Multiple 
Parentheses ( ) indicate expenditure decreases. 
*Amounts reflect most recent analysis of this legislation. 
 
Sources of Information
 
 
LFC Files 
 
Agency Analysis Received From 
Department of Health (DOH) Health Care Authority (HCA) 
New Mexico Public School Insurance Authority (NMPSIA) 
Regulation and Licensing Department (RLD) 
Retiree Health Care Authority (RHCA) 
Office of Superintendent of Insurance (OSI) 
University of New Mexico Health Sciences Center (UNMHSC) 
 
SUMMARY 
 
Synopsis of Senate Bill 39 
 
Senate Bill 39 (SB39) would amend the Prior Authorization Act to prohibit prior authorization 
and step therapy—the insurance plan practice of requiring patients to try less expensive 
medication first—for medications that are prescribed for on-label or off-label use for the 
treatment of rare disease or medical condition that affects fewer than 200 thousand people in the 
United States.  
 
Off-label use is defined as a medication or medication dosage not approved by the federal Food 
and Drug Administration (FDA) for treatment of a specific condition or disease but has sufficient  Senate Bill 39 – Page 2 
 
 
evidence to consider the medication and dosage medically necessary for treatment. Medical 
necessity determination requirements have been updated such that they must be completed by a 
healthcare professional from the same or similar practice specialty that typically manages the 
disease or condition in question. Medical necessity determinations are required to be completed 
within seven days or 24 hours in cases where the condition or disease may seriously jeopardize a 
person's life or health, affect a person's ability to regain maximum function, or subject a person 
to severe and intolerable pain. Medical necessity determinations not completed within the 
specified time limits will be deemed automatically approved.   
 
This bill does not contain an effective date and, as a result, would go into effect 90 days after the 
Legislature adjourns if enacted, or June 20, 2025. 
 
FISCAL IMPLICATIONS  
 
The New Mexico Public School Insurance Authority (NMPSIA) reports under the provisions of 
the bill there could be a $1.9 million and potentially up to $12.9 million cost for medications and 
administrative fees and the loss of potential savings from medication utilization and rebates. 
 
The Retiree Health Care Authority (RHCA) reports the agency would incur additional claims 
and administrative costs under the provisions of the bill and removing the need for prior 
authorization and step therapy would impair cost-containment efforts. RHCA estimates the cost 
at $2.1 million in the first year and an additional 5 percent in subsequent years. 
 
The Health Care Authority (HCA) states health benefits plan would likely incur an indeterminate 
cost associated with the provisions of the bill. 
 
SIGNIFICANT ISSUES 
 
RHCA reports the federal Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) has guidelines for 
using on-label and off-label drugs in Medicare Advantage plans. CMS emphasizes that off-label 
drug use in step therapy programs must be supported by clinical research and widely accepted 
guidelines to ensure patient safety and efficacy. The National Committee for Quality Assurance 
(NCQA), which evaluates health plans through its Health Plan Accreditation program, supports 
policies that ensure step therapy protocols are transparent and evidence-based and include a 
straightforward process for exceptions when medically necessary. NCQA advocates patient 
protection and timely access to appropriate medications. Federal regulations ensure that step 
therapy programs are reviewed and approved by a Pharmacy and Therapeutics Committee, 
which includes practicing physicians and pharmacists. The committee bases its decisions on 
scientific evidence and standards of practice. The bill does not provide guidance to healthcare 
systems that might struggle to allocate resources appropriately, as it is unclear which diseases 
qualify as rare. 
 
CONFLICT, DUPLICATION, COMPANIONSHIP, RELATIONSHIP 
 
SB39 similar to Senate Bill 207, which also attempts to prohibit practices that restrict access to 
certain medications. 
 
  Senate Bill 39 – Page 3 
 
 
 
TECHNICAL ISSUES 
 
The Office of Superintendent of Insurance (OSI) notes the term “off-label” may need to be 
clarified that the drug must be approved by the FDA, but the indication or dosage to treat a 
specific condition or disease may not be approved. As currently written, the bill may be 
construed to require coverage of non-FDA approved medications which may be contrary to 
federal law. OSI suggests on page 4, lines 1-7: "off-label" means an FDA approved medication 
or a dosage of a medication that does not have an FDA approved indication ….” 
 
OTHER SUBSTANT IVE ISSUES 
 
The University of New Mexico Health Sciences Center (UNMHSC) notes prior authorization 
requirements often delay patient care, which can negatively affect clinical outcomes. Limiting 
step programs for vulnerable patients, such as those with cancer or autoimmune diseases, can 
ensure timely care that may prevent long-term complications and increase morbidity, remove 
unnecessary barriers to accessing care, and prevent adverse effects such as reduced quality of 
life, disruption of work, and increased risk of worsening conditions due to treatment delays. 
Reduced prior authorization requirements can also improve the efficiency of pharmacy 
operations. 
 
The Department of Health (DOH) notes for children with rare diseases, receiving an accurate 
diagnosis and promptly starting treatment can be critical. Approximately 50 percent of 
individuals with rare diseases are children. Only 5 percent to 7 percent of rare diseases have an 
FDA-approved treatment. Due to the lack of FDA-approved treatments, most medication for rare 
disease is prescribed off-label. In general, insurers and pharmacy benefit managers will not 
reimburse off-label use of drugs or medical devices. To access therapies prescribed by their 
physician, patients may be required to mostly pay out of pocket or provide additional paperwork 
which delays medication access.  
 
 
RAE/sgs/hg/sgs