New Mexico 2025 2025 Regular Session

New Mexico Senate Bill SB428 Introduced / Fiscal Note

Filed 02/22/2025

                    Fiscal impact reports (FIRs) are prepared by the Legislative Finance Committee (LFC) for standing finance 
committees of the Legislature. LFC does not assume responsibility for the accuracy of these reports if they 
are used for other purposes. 
 
F I S C A L    I M P A C T    R E P O R T 
 
 
SPONSOR López
/Sedillo Lopez 
LAST UPDATED 
ORIGINAL DATE 2/20/2025 
 
SHORT TITLE Crossover Youth Act 
BILL 
NUMBER Senate Bill 428 
  
ANALYST Garcia 
 
APPROPRIATION* 
(dollars in thousands) 
FY25 	FY26 
Recurring or 
Nonrecurring 
Fund 
Affected 
 $100.0 Recurring General Fund 
Parentheses ( ) indicate expenditure decreases. 
*Amounts reflect most recent analysis of this legislation. 
 
ESTIMATED ADDITIONAL OPERATING BUDGET IMPACT* 
(dollars in thousands) 
Agency/Program 
FY25 FY26 FY27 
3 Year 
Total Cost 
Recurring or 
Nonrecurring 
Fund 
Affected 
CYFD 
No fiscal 
impact 
At least $100.0 At least $100.0 
At least 
$200.0 
Recurring General Fund 
Parentheses ( ) indicate expenditure decreases. 
*Amounts reflect most recent analysis of this legislation. 
 
Relates to an appropriation in the General Appropriation Act  
Relates to House Bill 134, House Bill 163, House Bill 434, Senate Bill 26, and Senate Bill 326 
 
Sources of Information
 
 
LFC Files 
Annie E. Casey Foundation 
U.S. Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention, Journal of Juvenile Justice 
New Mexico Children’s Code Reform Taskforce June 2024 Report 
 
Agency Analysis Received From 
Office of Family Representation and Advocacy (OFRA) Administrative Office of the Courts (AOC) Administrative Office of the District Attorneys (AODA) 
 
Agency Analysis was Solicited but Not Received From 
Children, Youth and Families Department (CYFD) 
Law Office of the Public Defender (LOPD) 
 
Because of the short timeframe between the introduction of this bill and its first hearing, LFC has 
yet to receive analysis from state, education, or judicial agencies. This analysis could be updated 
if that analysis is received. 
 
  Senate Bill 428 – Page 2 
 
SUMMARY 
 
Synopsis of Senate Bill 428   
 
Senate Bill 428 establishes a “cross-over youth program” within the Children, Youth and 
Families Department (CYFD) to serve: 
 “Cross-over youth,” which the bill defines as a child who is simultaneously involved 
in both the child welfare and juvenile justice systems, whether or not a child has been 
adjudicated in those systems. 
 “Dually involved eligible adults,” which the bill defines as a person who is being 
served by the Foster Connection program and who is simultaneously involved in the 
juvenile justice system or adult criminal system. 
 
The program would hire a coordinator to facilitate coordination between Protective Services and 
Juvenile Justice Services within CYFD, the Fostering Connections Program, and the adult 
criminal justice system; collect and report data related to people in the program; and deliver 
mandatory training to professionals in the judicial, juvenile justice, and child protection systems. 
 
Senate Bill 428 also details procedures related to collaboration between CYFD, the Public 
Education Department (PED), the Department of Health (DOH), and the Health Care Authority 
(HCA) related to crossover youth and establishes the right for children in CYFD custody to have 
visits from family when the court allows.  
 
Senate Bill 428 also amends sections of the Delinquency Act to require that the crossover 
youth’s parent, guardian, or custodian, the crossover youth’s attorney and guardian ad litem, and 
the Protective Services Division of CYFD must be given reasonable notice of by the juvenile 
probation officer and an opportunity to be present at the preliminary inquiry of a crossover youth 
who is detained. Senate Bill 428 would also require a petition to revoke probation of a crossover 
youth to include a statement filed by the Juvenile Justice Services Division of CYFD that the 
division made reasonable efforts to help the crossover youth with successful completion of all 
probation requirement, including the details of such efforts.  
 
Senate Bill 428 appropriates $100,000 from the general fund to the Children, Youth and Families 
Department to create and staff the crossover youth program.   
 
This bill does not contain an effective date and, as a result, would go into effect 90 days after the 
Legislature adjourns if enacted, or June 20, 2025. 
 
FISCAL IMPLICATIONS  
 
Senate Bill 428 appropriates $100 thousand to the Children, Youth and Families to establish a 
crossover youth program within the agency.  
 
The bill requires that the agency hire a coordinator to implement the program and provide 
coordination and training within CYFD and across agencies. Currently, the average cost of a 
position with Protective Services and Juvenile Justice, including salary and benefits, is roughly 
$100 thousand. This appropriation is not contained with the HAFC substitute for the General 
Appropriation Act and may be insufficient to establish and implement the program as outlined in  Senate Bill 428 – Page 3 
 
Senate Bill 428. However, CYFD has significant resources, including unused resources, within 
the Juvenile Justice Services program that could be used to implement the program and support 
crossover youth. In FY24, the Juvenile Justice Services budget was $81 million, while actual 
spending was $74 million, and the Juvenile Justice Services program within CYFD has had 
significant reversions in recent years.  
 
The Administrative Office of the Courts (AOC) notes potential minimal administrative costs for 
statewide update, distribution, and documentation of statutory changes and potential fiscal 
impacts to any changes to statute that may result in increased court activities. AOC also reports 
potential costs associated with collaborating with CYFD to develop and deliver mandatory 
training related to crossover youth.  
 
The Office of Family Representation and Advocacy (OFRA) reports the bill will not have a 
fiscal impact on the agency unless guardians ad litem and youth attorneys in foster care cases are 
required to participate in juvenile justice planning or proceedings, which could increase 
workload.  
 
SIGNIFICANT ISSUES 
 
Youth involved in both the child welfare and juvenile justice systems are referred to as 
“crossover,” “dually-involved,” or “dually-adjudicated” youth. According to the Annie E. Casey 
Foundation, involvement in both systems is associated with higher risks for behavioral health, 
educational, and vocational challenges, higher rates of recidivism, longer stays in detention, and 
poorer placement stability and permanency outcomes. The foundation reports national data 
related to crossover youth which indicate: 
 
 92 percent of crossover youth are first involved in the child welfare system; 
 40 percent are female, which is disproportionally high compared to the general juvenile 
justice population; 
 83 percent experience challenges with behavioral health or substance use; and 
 Youth who experience child maltreatment are at 47 percent greater risk of becoming 
involved in delinquency, compared to youth in the general population 
 
According to a report developed by the LFC for the Senate Memorial 5 Taskforce, national 
research indicates between 7 percent and 29 percent of youth with a history of child welfare 
system involvement are estimated to have also touched the juvenile justice system at some point, 
and between 45 percent and 83 percent of youth in the juvenile legal system nationally have a 
history of child welfare involvement.  
 
A 2015 study published by CYFD in the peer-reviewed Journal of Juvenile Justice concluded 23 
percent of Juvenile Justice Services clients in New Mexico had a history of substantiated 
Protective Services involvement, and 34 percent had some interaction with Protective Services. 
This study noted on average children who experience maltreatment begin committing crimes at 
younger ages, commit nearly twice as many offenses, and are arrested more frequently. The 
study concluded that the identification of risk factors influencing the development of behavioral 
challenges that lead to juvenile justice involvement will help to identify future children at risk. 
The study also noted that preventing a life of crime for a high-risk youth results in an estimated 
reduction in costs to society of between $2.6 million and $5.3 million by age 18.   Senate Bill 428 – Page 4 
 
New Mexico has the ability to track and examine data and trends related to dually-involved 
youth but has not done this analysis in at least a decade. CYFD has reported to the LFC that a 
lack of integrated data systems hinders the ability of the department to match and track crossover 
youth.  
 
In 2024, the Children’s Code Reform Taskforce issued a report recommending the state adopt 
legislation to define terms related to crossover youth and allow for the accurate tracking of data 
concerning crossover youth and establish a position within CYFD to support these youth.  
 
PERFORMANCE IMPLICATIONS 
 
AOC notes Senate Bill 428 may have an impact on performance measures which include cases 
filed and disposed.  
 
CONFLICT, DUPLICATION, COMPANIONSHIP, RELATIONSHIP 
 
Conflicts with House Bill 134, House Bill 163, House Bill 434, Senate Bill 26, and Senate Bill 
326, all of which make changes to the Delinquency Act.  
 
Relates to the HAFC substitute for the General Appropriations Act, would appropriate a total of 
$82 million for the Juvenile Justice Services Program within CYFD but does not include a 
specific appropriation for the purposes outlined in Senate Bill 428.  
 
 
RMG/hj/Sl2