New Mexico 2025 2025 Regular Session

New Mexico Senate Bill SB49 Introduced / Fiscal Note

Filed 02/03/2025

                    Fiscal impact reports (FIRs) are prepared by the Legislative Finance Committee (LFC) for standing finance 
committees of the Legislature. LFC does not assume responsibility for the accuracy of these reports if they 
are used for other purposes. 
 
F I S C A L    I M P A C T    R E P O R T 
 
 
SPONSOR Stewart 
LAST UPDATED 
ORIGINAL DATE 2/3/2025 
 
SHORT TITLE Community Benefit Fund Transfers 
BILL 
NUMBER Senate Bill 49 
  
ANALYST Hilla 
  
APPROPRIATION* 
(dollars in thousands) 
Entity  	FY26 
Recurring or 
Nonrecurring 
Fund 
Affected Economic Development 
Department 
$40,000.0 Nonrecurring Community Benefit Fund 
Community Energy Efficiency 
Development Block Grant Fund 
$20,000.0 Nonrecurring Community Benefit Fund 
Grid Modernization Fund $100,000.0 Nonrecurring Community Benefit Fund 
Transportation Project Fund $50,000.0 N	onrecurring Community Benefit Fund 
State Supplemental Land and 
Water Conservation Fund 
$5,000.0 Nonrecurring Community Benefit Fund 
Energy, Minerals. And Natural 
Resources Department  
$40,000.0 Nonrecurring Community Benefit Fund 
Workforce Solutions 
Department 
$25,000.0 Nonrecurring Community Benefit Fund 
Public School Facilities 
Authority 
$60,000.0 Nonrecurring Community Benefit Fund 
Parentheses ( ) indicate expenditure decreases. 
*Amounts reflect most recent analysis of this legislation. 
  
  
ESTIMATED ADDITIONAL OPERATING BUDGET IMPACT* 
(dollars in thousands) 
Agency/Program 
FY25 FY26 FY27 
3 Year 
Total Cost 
Recurring or 
Nonrecurring 
Fund 
Affected 
EDD 
No fiscal 
impact 
$100.0 $100.0 $200.0 	Recurring General Fund 
DFA 
No fiscal 
impact 
$100.0 $100.0 	$200.0 Recurring General Fund 
Total 
No fiscal 
impact 
$200.0 $200.0 $400.0 Recurring General Fund 
Parentheses ( ) indicate expenditure decreases. 
*Amounts reflect most recent analysis of this legislation. 
 
Relates to Senate Bill 48 creating the community benefit fund.  
 
Sources of Information
 
 
LFC Files 
 
Agency Analysis Received From 
Department of Finance and Administration (DFA) 
Public School Facilities Authority (PSFA)  Senate Bill 49 – Page 2 
 
Economic Development Department (EDD) 
Energy, Minerals, and Natural Resources Department (EMNRD) 
Public Regulation Commission (PRC) 
Workforce Solutions Department (WSD) 
 
Agency Analysis was Solicited but Not Received From 
Department of Transportation (DOT) 
SUMMARY 
 
Synopsis of Senate Bill 49   
 
Senate Bill 49 (SB49) appropriates $340 million from the community benefit fund. 
Appropriations include: 
 $40 million to the Economic Development Department (EDD) to assist in diversifying 
and promoting the state’s economy by fostering economic development opportunities 
unrelated to fossil fuel development or use, such as aerospace, cybersecurity, biosciences, 
film and television, etc., for expenditure from FY26 through FY28; 
 $20 million to the community energy efficiency development block grant fund at the 
Energy, Minerals, and Natural Resources Department (EMNRD);  
 $100 million to the grid modernization grant fund at EMNRD;  
 $50 million to the transportation project fund at the Department of Transportation (DOT) 
for transportation-related projects that reduce the use of combustion engine vehicles, 
including bicycle and pedestrian infrastructure and pedestrian safety; 
 $5 million to the state supplemental land and water conservation fund for purposes of the 
Outdoor Recreation Act at EMNRD for expenditure in FY26 through FY28;  
 $40 million to EMNRD to provide competitive grants to develop or enhance energy 
efficiency technology, renewable energy technology, batteries, and other systems capable 
of retaining, storing, and delivering energy by chemical, thermal, mechanical or other 
means and any interconnection equipment required to interconnect these systems with the 
electric grid, for expenditure in FY26 through FY28;  
 $25 million to the Workforce Solutions Department (WSD) to collaborate with the 
Higher Education Department (HED) to provide training in non-extractive industries, for 
expenditure in FY26 through FY28; 
 $60 million to the Public School Facilities Authority (PSFA) for electrical vehicle 
charging infrastructure for school districts and the difference in cost between upgrading 
from diesel-fueled school buses to electric school buses, for expenditure FY26 through 
FY28.  
 
For appropriations with specific expenditure dates, any unexpended or unencumbered balances at 
the end of FY28 shall revert to the community benefit fund.  
 
SB49 is contingent on the passage of the community benefit fund in Senate Bill 48 (SB48). 
 
This bill does not contain an effective date and, as a result, would go into effect 90 days after the 
Legislature adjourns if enacted, or June 20, 2025. 
 
  Senate Bill 49 – Page 3 
 
 
FISCAL IMPLICATIONS  
 
The appropriation of $340 million contained in this bill is a nonrecurring expense to the 
community benefit fund. Any unexpended or unencumbered balance remaining at the end of 
FY28 shall revert to the community benefit fund for appropriations made to EMNRD, EDD, 
WSD, PSFA, and the state supplemental land and water conservation fund. Appropriations made 
to the grid modernization grant fund and the transportation project fund will not revert.  
 
EDD states that it will need to increase its operating budget to administer the appropriation in 
SB49. However, this would create a full-time position for a nonrecurring appropriation item, so 
if funding from SB49 could also be used for administrative expenses, agencies like EDD would 
not need new recurring funding to its operating budget to create full-time positions for one-time 
appropriations. The analysis in this fiscal impact report assumes that SB49 does not cover 
administrative expenses and thus requires agencies like EDD to increase hiring levels. Similar 
administrative cost concerns were also noted by the Department of Finance and Administration 
(DFA) and are included in this fiscal analysis. 
 
SIGNIFICANT ISSUES 
 
The Executive and LFC both recommended an $8 million nonrecurring special appropriation 
from the general fund to the state supplemental land and water conversation fund (SSLWCF) at 
EMNRD to provide matches for federal funds. The $5 million appropriation from the community 
benefit fund to the SSLWCF is duplicative of the $8 million appropriation currently in House 
Bill 2. Due to this duplication, EMNRD asks for the $5 million currently in SB49 to be 
repurposed for housing for firefighters. However, should SB49 repurpose the $5 million 
appropriation to SSLWCF for firefighter housing, that could become a recurring cost, and 
EMNRD would need to find other sources of funding to cover the recurring costs of housing 
outside of the community benefit fund.  
 
EMNRD states that the community energy efficiency development (CEED) block grant fund has 
not been adequately funded to meet the demand of providing grants to low-income and “frontline 
communities to purchase products aimed at increasing energy efficiency in homes to decrease 
their energy burdens.” The department states this appropriation would address unmet needs.  
 
PSFA states that the total cost of ownership of electric vehicle charging infrastructure will vary 
across school districts. PSFA states without knowing how many school districts would move 
their school bus fleets from diesel to electric, the agency cannot determine if the $60 million 
appropriations are sufficient considering the total cost of ownership. Additionally, PSFA states 
that the Regulation and Licensing Department (RLD) adopted its Commercial Energy Code and 
included requirements for electric vehicle charging stations for passenger vehicles, which 
required schools to provide 5 percent of the required parking spots with electric vehicle charging 
stations with another 5 percent for future stations but did not include bus charging stations. PSFA 
states current estimates show a 40 percent increase in electrical costs to install infrastructure and 
devices required for electric vehicle charging for buses.  
 
PERFORMANCE IMPLICATIONS 
 
WSD states that Executive Order 2024-152 requires state agencies to collaborate on developing 
the workforce for “climate-ready” professions by the end of 2026. The department states that  Senate Bill 49 – Page 4 
 
climate-related workforce training is part of its 2024-2027 Workforce Innovation and 
Opportunity Act (WIOA) plan. The LFC program evaluations, Workforce Development Post 
Covid-19 Pandemic and Improving New Mexico’s Workforce Participation, highlight the 
fragmentation and duplication of services that persist across the state’s workforce programs and 
raise concerns about the implementation of workforce programs under WIOA. In particular, the 
latter report elucidates the difficulties many higher education students currently face in accessing 
WIOA Title I services. This evaluation recommended WSD continue its current work in 
developing an aligned case management system that will allow all New Mexicans, including 
higher education students, to more easily access federal and state programs related to workforce 
training and wraparound supports. The success of this part of SB49 is partially contingent on 
continuing coordination efforts and the buy-in of the local workforce development boards, which 
oversee the Title I application process.  
 
In 2024, the Legislature appropriated $60 million to the Higher Education Department from the 
government results and opportunity (GRO) fund to be spent over three years to support noncredit 
workforce training programs at higher education institutions. Aligned with the accountability 
stipulations of the GRO fund, HED is collecting enrollment and outcomes data from the state’s 
higher education institutions. A 2024 LFC program evaluation, Postsecondary Certificates, 
found that while some workforce training pays off for students in the form of increased salary 
and career opportunities, not all training leads to substantive gains. The climate-related 
workforce training funding appropriated in SB49 would potentially build on existing GRO 
funding, but does not contain the same reporting or accountability requirements as the GRO.  
 
PSFA states the Public-School Capital Outlay Committee (PSCOC) will need to develop a new 
funding program to track and administer these funds and will require additional PSFA staff with 
electric vehicle expertise.  
 
CONFLICT, DUPLICATION, COMPANIONSHIP, RELATIONSHIP 
 
SB49 is the companion bill of SB48, which creates the community benefit fund. SB49 is 
contingent on the passage of SB48.  
 
OTHER SUBSTANT IVE ISSUES 
 
SB48 outlines that the community benefit fund can be used for projects that reduce the use of 
combustion engine vehicles through transportation projects, including projects that increase 
electric vehicle infrastructure or bicycle and pedestrian infrastructure. In 67-3-78 (A) NMSA 
1978, the Department of Transportation can establish a subaccount of the transportation project 
fund to ensure SB49’s $50 million appropriation for the fund matches SB48 and SB49’s 
transportation project intentions.  
 
DFA states that SB49’s funding would allow the WSD to continue providing job training for 
cybersecurity and information technology initiatives with the Department of Information 
Technology.  
 
EH/rl/SR