New Mexico 2025 2025 Regular Session

New Mexico Senate Bill SJR11 Introduced / Fiscal Note

Filed 02/16/2025

                     
 
Fiscal impact reports (FIRs) are prepared by the Legislative Finance Committee (LFC) for standing finance 
committees of the Legislature. LFC does not assume responsibility for the accuracy of these reports if they 
are used for other purposes. 
 
F I S C A L    I M P A C T    R E P O R T 
 
 
SPONSOR 
Sen.s Trujillo and Gallegos/Rep. 
Armstrong 
LAST UPDATED 
ORIGINAL DATE 2/16/25 
 
SHORT TITLE School Elections Timing, CA 
BILL 
NUMBER 
Senate Joint 
Resolution 11 
  
ANALYST Liu 
  
ESTIMATED ADDITIONAL OPERATING BUDGET IMPACT* 
(dollars in thousands) 
Agency/Program FY25 FY26 FY27 
3 Year 
Total Cost 
Recurring or 
Nonrecurring 
Fund 
Affected 
Election Costs $35.0 - $50.0 $35.0 	- $50.0 Nonrecurring General Fund 
Parentheses ( ) indicate expenditure decreases. 
*Amounts reflect most recent analysis of this legislation. 
 
Sources of Information
 
 
LFC Files 
 
Agency Analysis Received From 
Secretary of State (SOS) Public School Facilities Authority (PSFA) 
Regional Education Cooperatives (REC) 
 
Agency Analysis was Solicited but Not Received From 
Public Education Department (PED) 
SUMMARY 
 
Synopsis of Senate Joint Resolution 11 
 
Senate Joint Resolution 11 (SJR11) amends the New Mexico Constitution, striking the phrase 
“All school elections shall be held at different times from partisan elections.” 
 
The joint resolution provides the amendment be put before the voters at the next general election 
(November 2026) or a special election called for the purpose of considering the amendment. The 
amendment would only be effective if approved by voters. 
 
FISCAL IMPLICATIONS  
 
Under Section 1-16-4 NMSA 1978 and the New Mexico Constitution, the Secretary of State 
(SOS) is required to print samples of the text of each constitutional amendment in both Spanish 
and English in an amount equal to 10 percent of the registered voters in the state. SOS is required 
to publish the samples once a week for four weeks preceding the election in newspapers in every 
county in the state. Further, the number of constitutional amendments on the ballot may impact  Senate Joint Resolution 11 – Page 2 
 
 
the ballot page size or cause the ballot to be more than one page, also increasing costs. The 
estimated cost per constitutional amendment is $35 thousand to $50 thousand, depending on the 
size and number of ballots and if additional ballot stations are needed.  
 
Should this proposed constitutional amendment be approved by voters, the Public School 
Facilities Authority (PSFA) notes more districts could place bond or mill levy questions on 
partisan elections, which could increase local capital outlay revenue and provide matching funds 
to apply for state capital outlay dollars for school facilities. The timing of bond questions and 
mill levies affects school district planning for facility replacements and renovations. Allowing 
districts to place these questions on the ballot alongside partisan elections would likely result in 
cost savings for schools because they must otherwise pay for the costs of special elections.  
 
SIGNIFICANT ISSUES 
 
According to SOS, the history of the limiting language in Article 7, Section 1, begins during the 
state’s Constitutional Convention in 1910. Around that time, women were only granted the right 
to vote in school elections. New Mexico approved the 19
th
 Amendment to the U.S. Constitution 
in 1920, granting women the right to vote in all elections, but the limitation on school district 
ballot questions in Article 7, Section 1, of New Mexico Constitution remained.  
 
When school districts are unable to place ballot questions on a general election ballot, they often 
must hold special elections. In 2024, SOS notes there were six special elections for school 
districts, and as of January 2025, there are currently five special elections for school districts. 
These are all mail elections paid for by the district. This resolution would bring school districts 
into alignment with all other local governments, which already place ballot questions on 
statewide election ballots. Additionally, the change would likely increase voter participation in 
school elections. 
 
ADMINISTRATIVE IMPLICATIONS  
 
SOS notes county clerks administer special elections. This resolution would likely reduce the 
number of special elections, reducing administrative burdens for these entities. 
 
OTHER SUBSTANT IVE ISSUES 
 
The introduced version of Senate Joint Resolution 4 in the 2008 legislative session attempted to 
accomplish what this resolution proposes—eliminating a clause in the constitution to set school 
elections separately from other elections. However, the Senate Rules Committee amended the 
resolution in 2008 to only change the term “other” to “partisan” rather than strike the entire 
sentence. Failure on the part of the New Mexico Compilation Commission to update the 
constitution resulted in a mistake on subsequent ballots, which resulted in an attempt to re-amend 
the section and eventually the 2017 New Mexico Supreme Court case, State of New Mexico, ex 
rel., League of Women Voters v. Advisory Committee to the New Mexico Compilation 
Commission. 
 
In 2008, voters approved the following amendment to this clause in Article 7, Section 1 of the 
New Mexico Constitution (513 thousand in favor, or 74.5 percent): “All school elections shall be 
held at different times from [other] partisan elections.”  Senate Joint Resolution 11 – Page 3 
 
 
 
In 2010, voters approved an amendment within the same article and section of the constitution 
(209.6 thousand in favor, or 57 percent); however, because the New Mexico Compilation 
Commission had not updated the language from the 2008 amendment, the clause reverted to: 
“All school elections shall be held at different times from other elections.” 
 
In 2014, voters approved the same amendment from 2008 to the same clause in Article 7, Section 
1, of the New Mexico Constitution (258.7 thousand in favor, or 57.7 percent): “All school 
elections shall be held at different times from [other] partisan elections.” 
 
In 2015, more than 10 months after the election, plaintiffs sued the commission in State v. 
Compilation Commission, for failing to compile the amendment in the constitution, which 
remained: “All school elections shall be held at different times from other elections.” 
 
In 2017, the Supreme Court ordered the compilation of amendments to Article 7, Section 1, of 
the constitution to be: “All school elections shall be held at different times from partisan 
elections.” 
 
 
SL/hg/sgs