Nevada Senate Bill SB217

Nevada 2023 Regular Session

• Introduced: 3/6/23
• Refer: 3/6/23
• Failed: 6/6/23

Caption

Makes a supplemental appropriation to the Office of the State Treasurer for an unanticipated shortfall related to travel expenses. (BDR S-1084)

Impact

The passage of SB217 will not have a direct impact on local government finances, as the fiscal note points out that the effects are contained within the state budget. The appropriation is an addition to the funds already allocated in previous legislative sessions, indicating a reliance on careful financial planning and the need for flexibility in budgeting to accommodate unforeseen expenses. The bill highlights a proactive approach by the state in managing its financial commitments and responsibilities effectively.

Summary

Senate Bill 217 aims to address an unanticipated budget shortfall related to travel expenses for the Office of the State Treasurer. This supplemental appropriation will allocate a sum of $65,082 from the State General Fund to cover these unexpected costs. The bill emphasizes the importance of financial oversight and management within state offices, ensuring that necessary travel expenses can still be met without disrupting the overall state budget framework.

Sentiment

The overall sentiment surrounding SB217 appears to be neutral, as it primarily aims to remedy a specific financial issue without introducing significant changes to existing laws or regulations. Senators and financial committee members may express varying opinions during discussions, but the nature of the bill suggests consensus on the necessity of this appropriation, reflecting a collaborative effort to ensure the smooth operation of state functions.

Contention

While SB217 does not seem to have generated considerable controversy or debate, it does underscore potential issues related to state budgeting priorities and financial transparency. Some legislators may express concerns about repeated shortfalls and the need for more thorough budgetary assessments going forward. However, as it stands, the bill focuses more on overcoming a specific deficit rather than igniting broader legislative contention.