Nevada Senate Bill SB456

Nevada 2023 Regular Session

• Introduced: 5/8/23
• Refer: 5/8/23
• Report Pass: 5/27/23
• Engrossed: 5/30/23
• Refer: 5/30/23
• Report Pass: 6/1/23
• Enrolled: 6/8/23
• Chaptered: 6/12/23
• Passed: 6/12/23

Caption

Makes appropriations to the Office of Finance in the Office of the Governor for the costs of leases and furniture for state offices and training for state employees. (BDR S-1113)

Impact

The bill's implications on state law involve financial management and allocations, effectively reinforcing the budgetary framework for the governance of state offices. The provisions within SB456 focus on improving the operational capacity of state agencies by ensuring that they have the necessary resources for functioning, including updated infrastructure and trained personnel. The legislation reflects a prioritization of state administrative needs and underscores the importance of proper funding for the operational functions of governmental entities.

Summary

Senate Bill 456 aims to make appropriations for the Office of Finance within the Governor's Office. It designates $50,000,000 to cover the costs of leases and furniture for state offices, along with an additional $5,000,000 allocated for training state employees. This funding is aimed at ensuring that state facilities are updated and adequately equipped to serve government functions and to support the development of the workforce functioning within the state administration. The appropriations are stipulated to not be committed for expenditure beyond June 30, 2025, to ensure fiscal responsibility.

Contention

While the bill passed unanimously with 42 votes in favor and none against during its final passage in the Assembly, it may still face scrutiny regarding the priorities placed on financial allocations amidst other pressing state needs. Critics might argue against the relative scale of funding towards office furnishings versus other necessities such as public health or education. Nonetheless, there hasn’t been significant public dissent recorded in relation to this specific legislation, indicating an overall consensus on the importance of state office infrastructure and employee development.