Nevada Senate Bill SB491

Nevada 2023 Regular Session

• Introduced: 5/11/23
• Refer: 5/11/23
• Report Pass: 5/27/23
• Engrossed: 5/30/23
• Refer: 5/30/23
• Report Pass: 6/1/23
• Enrolled: 6/8/23
• Chaptered: 6/13/23
• Passed: 6/13/23

Caption

Revises provisions related to the Department of Business and Industry concerning information technology. (BDR S-1167)

Impact

The bill not only provides a crucial extension for the use of allocated funds but also makes additional appropriations for necessary updates to the department’s computer hardware and software systems. Several sections of the bill allocate funds to various branches within the Department of Business and Industry, including costs associated with updating hardware, software applications, and related equipment. This spending indicates a commitment to modernizing the technological infrastructure that supports critical governmental functions linked to business licensing and operations.

Summary

Senate Bill 491 addresses the revision of laws related to the Department of Business and Industry, primarily focusing on the budgeting and funding aspects concerning the Real Estate Division's licensing software system. The bill extends the time frame during which the previously allocated funds can be utilized, shifting the deadline for reverting any unspent appropriations from September 15, 2023, to September 19, 2025. The total budget allocated for the software update remains unchanged at $693,670, ensuring the Real Estate Division has adequate time to improve its operational software.

Contention

There may be differing opinions on the budgeting priorities reflected in SB491, particularly regarding the state's ongoing investment in technology for government operations. While supporters of the bill likely argue that improving the technology framework for the Real Estate Division is critical for efficient governmental service delivery, critics might question whether these expenditures are the best use of state funds amid other pressing societal needs. Overall discussions surrounding the bill potentially reflect broader themes of governmental efficiency and accountability in state spending.