Nevada 2025 2025 Regular Session

Nevada Assembly Bill AB275 Introduced / Bill

                      
  
  	A.B. 275 
 
- 	*AB275* 
 
ASSEMBLY BILL NO. 275–ASSEMBLYMEMBERS O’NEILL, DELONG, 
DICKMAN; EDGEWORTH, GRAY, GURR, HARDY, HIBBETTS, 
KASAMA, KOENIG AND YUREK 
 
FEBRUARY 24, 2025 
____________ 
 
Referred to Committee on Judiciary 
 
SUMMARY—Revises provisions related to criminal procedure. 
(BDR 14-548) 
 
FISCAL NOTE: Effect on Local Government: No. 
 Effect on the State: No. 
 
~ 
 
EXPLANATION – Matter in bolded italics is new; matter between brackets [omitted material] is material to be omitted. 
 
 
AN ACT relating to criminal procedure; providing that the 
interception, listening or recording of a wire, electronic or 
oral communication by a peace officer or certain other 
persons is not unlawful in certain circumstances; and 
providing other matters properly relating thereto. 
Legislative Counsel’s Digest: 
 Existing law provides that the interception, listening or recording of a wire, 1 
electronic or oral communication by a peace officer or certain other persons is not 2 
unlawful if the peace officer or person is intercepting the communication of a 3 
person who has: (1) barricaded himself or herself, resulting in an imminent risk of 4 
harm to the life of another person; (2) created a hostage situation; or (3) threatened 5 
the imminent illegal use of an explosive. (NRS 179.463, 200.620) Sections 3 and 6 6 
of this bill similarly provide that the interception, listening or recording of a wire, 7 
electronic or oral communication by a peace officer or certain persons acting under 8 
the direction or request of a peace officer is not unlawful if the peace officer or 9 
person is intercepting the communication for the sole purpose of investigating a 10 
sexual offense against a child. Section 2 of this bill defines the term “sexual offense 11 
against a child” for purposes of section 3 and certain other provisions of existing 12 
law relating to the interception of communications. Section 4 of this bill makes 13 
certain definitions prescribed by existing law applicable to sections 2 and 3. 14 
Section 5 of this bill makes a conforming change by eliminating certain language 15 
made redundant by section 2. 16 
 
   
 	– 2 – 
 
 
- 	*AB275* 
THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEVADA, REPRESENTED IN 
SENATE AND ASSEMBLY, DO ENACT AS FOLLOWS: 
 
 Section 1.  Chapter 179 of NRS is hereby amended by adding 1 
thereto the provisions set forth as sections 2 and 3 of this act. 2 
 Sec. 2.  “Sexual offense against a child” includes any act 3 
upon a child constituting: 4 
 1.  Incest pursuant to NRS 201.180; 5 
 2.  Lewdness with a child pursuant to NRS 201.230; 6 
 3.  Sado-masochistic abuse pursuant to NRS 201.262; 7 
 4.  Sexual assault pursuant to NRS 200.366; 8 
 5.  Statutory sexual seduction pursuant to NRS 200.368; 9 
 6.  Open or gross lewdness pursuant to NRS 201.210; or 10 
 7.  Luring a child or a person with mental illness pursuant to 11 
NRS 201.560, if punished as a felony. 12 
 Sec. 3.  1. The interception, listening or recording of a wire, 13 
electronic or oral communication by a peace officer, or a person 14 
acting under the direction or request of a peace officer, is not 15 
unlawful if the peace officer or person is intercepting the 16 
communication for the sole purpose of investigating a sexual 17 
offense against a child. 18 
 2. As used in this section, “person” means: 19 
 (a) A child, with the consent of the parent or legal guardian of 20 
the child; or 21 
 (b) The parent or legal guardian of a child. 22 
 Sec. 4.  NRS 179.410 is hereby amended to read as follows: 23 
 179.410 As used in NRS 179.410 to 179.515, inclusive, and 24 
sections 2 and 3 of this act, except where the context otherwise 25 
requires, the words and terms defined in NRS 179.415 to 179.455, 26 
inclusive, and section 2 of this act have the meanings ascribed to 27 
them in those sections. 28 
 Sec. 5.  NRS 179.460 is hereby amended to read as follows: 29 
 179.460 1.  The Attorney General or the district attorney of 30 
any county may apply to a Supreme Court justice or to a district 31 
judge in the county where the interception is to take place for an 32 
order authorizing the interception of wire, electronic or oral 33 
communications, and the judge may, in accordance with NRS 34 
179.470 to 179.515, inclusive, grant an order authorizing the 35 
interception of wire, electronic or oral communications by 36 
investigative or law enforcement officers having responsibility for 37 
the investigation of the offense as to which the application is made, 38 
when the interception may provide evidence of the commission of 39 
murder, kidnapping, robbery, extortion, bribery, escape of an 40 
offender in the custody of the Department of Corrections, 41 
destruction of public property by explosives, a sexual offense 42   
 	– 3 – 
 
 
- 	*AB275* 
against a child, sex trafficking, a violation of NRS 200.463, 200.464 1 
or 200.465, trafficking in persons in violation of NRS 200.467 or 2 
200.468, a violation of NRS 201.553, the commission of any 3 
offense which is made a felony by the provisions of chapter 453 or 4 
454 of NRS or a violation of NRS 463.160 or 465.086. 5 
 2.  A provider of electronic communication service or a public 6 
utility, an officer, employee or agent thereof or another person 7 
associated with the provider of electronic communication service or 8 
public utility who, pursuant to an order issued pursuant to 9 
subsection 1, provides information or otherwise assists an 10 
investigative or law enforcement officer in the interception of a 11 
wire, electronic or oral communication is immune from any liability 12 
relating to any interception made pursuant to the order. 13 
 [3.  As used in this section, “sexual offense against a child” 14 
includes any act upon a child constituting: 15 
 (a) Incest pursuant to NRS 201.180; 16 
 (b) Lewdness with a child pursuant to NRS 201.230; 17 
 (c) Sado-masochistic abuse pursuant to NRS 201.262; 18 
 (d) Sexual assault pursuant to NRS 200.366; 19 
 (e) Statutory sexual seduction pursuant to NRS 200.368; 20 
 (f) Open or gross lewdness pursuant to NRS 201.210; or 21 
 (g) Luring a child or a person with mental illness pursuant to 22 
NRS 201.560, if punished as a felony.] 23 
 Sec. 6.  NRS 200.620 is hereby amended to read as follows: 24 
 200.620 1.  Except as otherwise provided in subsection 5 and 25 
NRS 179.410 to 179.515, inclusive, 209.419 and 704.195, it is 26 
unlawful for any person to intercept or attempt to intercept any wire 27 
communication unless: 28 
 (a) The interception or attempted interception is made with the 29 
prior consent of one of the parties to the communication; and 30 
 (b) An emergency situation exists and it is impractical to obtain 31 
a court order as required by NRS 179.410 to 179.515, inclusive, 32 
before the interception, in which event the interception is subject to 33 
the requirements of subsection 3. If the application for ratification is 34 
denied, any use or disclosure of the information so intercepted is 35 
unlawful, and the person who made the interception shall notify the 36 
sender and the receiver of the communication that: 37 
  (1) The communication was intercepted; and 38 
  (2) Upon application to the court, ratification of the 39 
interception was denied. 40 
 2.  This section does not apply to any person, or to the officers, 41 
employees or agents of any person, engaged in the business of 42 
providing service and facilities for wire communication where the 43 
interception or attempted interception is to construct, maintain, 44 
conduct or operate the service or facilities of that person. 45   
 	– 4 – 
 
 
- 	*AB275* 
 3.  Any person who has made an interception in an emergency 1 
situation as provided in paragraph (b) of subsection 1 shall, within 2 
72 hours of the interception, make a written application to a justice 3 
of the Supreme Court or district judge for ratification of the 4 
interception. The interception must not be ratified unless the 5 
applicant shows that: 6 
 (a) An emergency situation existed and it was impractical to 7 
obtain a court order before the interception; and 8 
 (b) Except for the absence of a court order, the interception met 9 
the requirements of NRS 179.410 to 179.515, inclusive. 10 
 4.  NRS 200.610 to 200.690, inclusive, do not prohibit the 11 
recording, and NRS 179.410 to 179.515, inclusive, do not prohibit 12 
the reception in evidence, of conversations on wire communications 13 
installed in the office of an official law enforcement or fire-fighting 14 
agency, or a public utility, if the equipment used for the recording is 15 
installed in a facility for wire communications or on a telephone 16 
with a number listed in a directory, on which emergency calls or 17 
requests by a person for response by the law enforcement or fire-18 
fighting agency or public utility are likely to be received. In 19 
addition, those sections do not prohibit the recording or reception in 20 
evidence of conversations initiated by the law enforcement or fire-21 
fighting agency or public utility from such a facility or telephone in 22 
connection with responding to the original call or request, if the 23 
agency or public utility informs the other party that the conversation 24 
is being recorded. 25 
 5. The interception or attempted interception of a wire 26 
communication is not unlawful under the circumstances set forth in 27 
subsection 1 of NRS 179.463 [.] or subsection 1 of section 3 of this 28 
act. 29 
 
H