Nevada Senate Bill SB480

Nevada 2025 Regular Session

• Introduced: 5/15/25
• Refer: 5/15/25
• Report Pass: 5/26/25
• Engrossed: 5/27/25
• Refer: 5/27/25
• Report Pass: 5/31/25
• Enrolled: 6/5/25
• Chaptered: 6/9/25
• Passed: 6/9/25

Caption

Makes an appropriation to the Office of Finance in the Office of the Governor for a loan to the Office of the Chief Information Officer within the Office of the Governor for the replacement of uninterruptible power supply equipment and related expenses. (BDR S-1177)

Impact

The financial implications of SB480 extend to the management and operation of essential technical infrastructure within the state government. The bill aims to ensure that critical information systems have reliable power backup, which is vital for maintaining operations during outages or disruptions. This investment not only underpins the functioning of state services but also reflects a commitment to modernize and sustain government resources that are crucial for public service delivery.

Summary

Senate Bill No. 480, introduced during the 83rd Session (2025), entails an appropriation to the Office of Finance within the Office of the Governor. The bill specifically authorizes a loan intended for the Office of the Chief Information Officer for the purposes of replacing uninterruptible power supply equipment and covering related expenses. The total amount appropriated is $790,902 for the fiscal year 2025-2026, with an additional $9,450 allocated for 2026-2027. These funds are structured as a loan, requiring repayment from revenues generated through intergovernmental transfers.

Contention

While the bill appears primarily administrative in nature, it does raise points of discussion concerning state budgeting priorities and the management of state resources. Critics may query the necessity of a loan structure for such appropriations, given the potential impacts on future budgets and the repayment obligations that will be imposed on the Chief Information Officer's future revenues. The bill showcases a proactive approach to technological resilience yet may demand scrutiny regarding fiscal responsibility and transparency in how these loans and appropriations are administered.