Nevada Senate Bill SB481

Nevada 2025 Regular Session

• Introduced: 5/15/25
• Refer: 5/15/25
• Report Pass: 5/26/25
• Engrossed: 5/27/25
• Refer: 5/27/25
• Report Pass: 5/31/25
• Enrolled: 6/5/25
• Chaptered: 6/9/25
• Passed: 6/9/25

Caption

Makes a supplemental appropriation to the Division of Public and Behavioral Health of the Department of Health and Human Services for an unanticipated shortfall related to the costs of provider services in the Southern Nevada Adult Mental Health Services budget account. (BDR S-1175)

Impact

The bill is designed to support mental health services in Nevada, notably those that cater to adult populations in Southern Nevada. This supplemental appropriation is crucial, especially given the increasing demand for mental health services and the potential consequences of service disruption. By addressing the funding shortfall, SB481 will help maintain the quality and availability of mental health care, directly impacting public health outcomes in the region. The approval of this bill underscores the state's commitment to mental health resources amid financial challenges.

Summary

Senate Bill 481 addresses a critical funding issue by making a supplemental appropriation to the Division of Public and Behavioral Health within the Nevada Department of Health and Human Services. Specifically, the bill responds to an unanticipated shortfall in the budget allocated for provider services in the Southern Nevada Adult Mental Health Services account. The amount appropriated is $1,647,791, aimed at ensuring continuous operation and service provision in mental health sectors affected by financial constraints.

Contention

While there appears to be strong legislative support for addressing mental health funding through SB481, the discussion around budget shortfalls and allocations may raise broader concerns about overall funding for mental health in the state. Stakeholders may argue about the adequacy of funding measures and whether supplemental appropriations are symptomatic of a larger issue regarding the stability and sufficiency of budget planning in public health services. These discussions could shape future legislative addressing of similar budgetary needs.