Nevada Senate Bill SB486

Nevada 2025 Regular Session

• Introduced: 5/15/25
• Refer: 5/15/25
• Report Pass: 5/22/25
• Engrossed: 5/23/25
• Refer: 5/23/25
• Report Pass: 5/28/25
• Enrolled: 6/4/25
• Chaptered: 6/6/25
• Passed: 6/6/25

Caption

Makes appropriations to the Nevada Promise Scholarship Account and the Account for Pensions for Silicosis, Diseases Related to Asbestos and Other Disabilities. (BDR S-1181)

Impact

The bill also makes a minor allocation of $1,000 to the Account for Pensions for Silicosis, Diseases Related to Asbestos and Other Disabilities. This appropriation reflects the state’s commitment to addressing health issues related to historical exposure to significant environmental hazards such as asbestos. By providing this funding, the bill seeks to ensure that individuals affected by these disabilities receive the necessary support and coverage for their medical needs, thereby promoting public health and safety.

Summary

Senate Bill No. 486 is a legislative proposal focused on appropriating necessary funds to specific accounts aimed at furthering educational opportunities and providing for public health needs in Nevada. The bill authorizes the allocation of $10,718,696 from the State General Fund to the Nevada Promise Scholarship Account, which aims to support students in their pursuit of higher education. This funding is essential for enhancing access to scholarships that can alleviate the financial burdens on students looking to enter community colleges or universities in the state.

Contention

While the primary focus of SB486 appears to be on educational and health-related spending, there may be underlying debates regarding the appropriateness of resource allocation. Advocates of the bill emphasize the importance of funding education to foster a skilled workforce and believe that supporting initiatives like the Nevada Promise Scholarship can significantly impact the state's economic development. Conversely, critics may raise concerns about the effectiveness of such scholarships or question whether the funds could be better utilized to address other pressing social issues or improve existing educational infrastructure.