Nevada Senate Bill SB488

Nevada 2025 Regular Session

• Introduced: 5/15/25
• Refer: 5/15/25
• Report Pass: 5/20/25
• Engrossed: 5/23/25
• Refer: 5/23/25
• Report Pass: 5/28/25
• Enrolled: 6/4/25
• Chaptered: 6/6/25
• Passed: 6/6/25

Caption

Makes appropriations to the Office of the Secretary of State for the replacement of certain equipment and certain costs related to elections. (BDR S-1178)

Impact

The introduction of SB488 is expected to significantly bolster the operational capabilities of the election infrastructure within the state. By allocating funds for necessary equipment upgrades and educational materials, this bill addresses critical areas that impact the efficiency and effectiveness of election processes. Enhanced voter education and outreach can lead to increased participation in electoral processes, while improved technology can streamline the management of elections and strengthen security measures. The funding for voter identity verification also underscores efforts to maintain the integrity of elections, addressing potential concerns about voter fraud.

Summary

Senate Bill No. 488 is a legislative proposal that aims to allocate funding to the Office of the Secretary of State for various election-related expenses. The bill proposes appropriations from the State General Fund, amounting to a total of $1,949,287, designated for the replacement of outdated equipment and the enhancement of voter education initiatives. Among the financial allocations, $460,423 is earmarked for replacing computers and technology, while $1,462,864 is allocated for voter education materials and outreach, alongside translation and interpretive services. Additionally, $26,000 is designated for voter identity verification efforts under the HAVA Election Reform budget account.

Contention

While the bill appears to have broad support, discussions around SB488 may touch upon concerns over the appropriateness of the funding levels and the oversight of how these appropriations are managed and spent. Some members of the legislature may raise questions about the allocation priorities, particularly regarding technology purchases versus educational outreach. The stipulations that funds must be expended by specific deadlines may also lead to discussions about the implications for effective budget management and the ability of the Office of the Secretary of State to meet these timelines. Given that elections are critical to the democratic process, any contention could center on ensuring transparency and efficiency in the use of public funds dedicated to electoral integrity.