New York Assembly Bill A00563

New York 2025-2026 Regular Session

• Introduced: 1/8/25
• Refer: 1/8/25
• Report Pass: 4/28/25
• Engrossed: 5/5/25
• Refer: 5/5/25

Caption

Requires the consumer protection division to promulgate a policy governing the use of automatic license plate reader systems by non-law enforcement agencies and non-government entities; requires such non-law enforcement agencies and non-government entities to conspicuously post such policy on their website or in their place of business.

Impact

If enacted, A00563 would have a notable impact on how automatic license plate readers are utilized within New York State. By enforcing a framework for non-law enforcement entities to follow, the legislation aims to mitigate potential misuse of data while providing the public with access to information regarding how their data may be collected and used. This regulation could lead to increased oversight of these systems and potentially influence the operational policies of businesses and organizations employing such technology. Additionally, the proposed law incorporates mandates for publicly posting these policies on their websites or in easily accessible physical locations, thus promoting greater transparency to the community.

Summary

A00563 is a proposed legislation in New York aimed at enhancing the regulation of automatic license plate reader (ALPR) systems used by non-law enforcement and non-government entities. The bill mandates that these entities develop, maintain, and publicly disseminate a policy that outlines the minimum standards for the use of such surveillance technology. This initiative is intended to ensure responsible use, transparency, and accountability in the collection and management of data through ALPR systems. The legislation places a strong emphasis on the establishment of clear guidelines regarding permissible uses of the technology, data sharing practices, and the protocols for record retention and training of employees handling the ALPR data.

Contention

Although supporters argue that the bill is a necessary step towards protecting consumer privacy and ensuring ethical use of surveillance technology, critics may contend that this level of regulation could impose excessive burdens on non-government entities, potentially stifling innovation and operational efficiency. There may also be debates regarding the balance between public safety and individual privacy rights, specifically concerning how data collected from ALPR systems is stored, used, and protected from unauthorized access. Stakeholders will likely engage in discussions about the implications for civil liberties and the appropriate level of oversight needed to safeguard residents’ rights in the age of increasing surveillance.