New York Assembly Bill A01119

New York 2025-2026 Regular Session

• Introduced: 1/9/25
• Refer: 1/9/25

Caption

Relates to the transparency and quality of care of operators of adult care facilities; requires certain applicants for adult care facilities to provide an opportunity for public comment on the application.

Impact

The proposed amendments will require that applicants seeking to establish adult care facilities engage in a certification process demonstrating their financial stability, legal compliance, and adherence to operational standards. It also mandates that public comments be solicited on applications for new facilities, allowing community input into the approval processes. This ensures that the interests and concerns of residents and stakeholders are taken into account when granting operational licenses.

Summary

Bill A01119 aims to enhance the transparency and quality of care within adult care facilities in New York State. The bill proposes amendments to the social services law and introduces a streamlined application process for operators and affiliates seeking approval for additional facilities of the same type. The intent is to facilitate easier access for existing operators in good standing, thereby promoting prompt facility establishment while maintaining standards of care.

Conclusion

As the New York State Assembly continues discussions on Bill A01119, the outcomes will have significant implications for future applicants seeking to establish adult care facilities. Striking a delicate balance between operational efficiency and stringent oversight remains a challenge, and the ongoing discourse will likely bring to light diverse opinions on how best to serve the interests of vulnerable populations residing in such facilities.

Contention

The bill is designed to balance the need for efficient facility operation with the necessity for rigorous oversight. However, potential points of contention arise concerning the weight and influence of public comments in the review process. Critics may argue that while seeking public input ensures accountability, it could also potentially delay approvals for necessary facilities. There may be disagreements on the definition of 'good standing' for operators and the implications it has for those with past infractions, even if they were not directly harmful to residents.