New York Assembly Bill A08245

New York 2025-2026 Regular Session

• Introduced: 5/5/25
• Refer: 5/5/25

Caption

Provides penalties when a landlord of a residential premises refuses to rent to a potential tenant on the basis that the potential tenant was involved in a past or pending landlord-tenant action or summary proceeding.

Impact

If enacted, A08245 would significantly change the landscape of tenant rights in New York. Tenants would gain the ability to take legal action if they believe they have been unfairly denied housing based on their previous rental disputes. The bill establishes a two-year statute of limitations for tenants to file lawsuits and emphasizes that such action can be taken independently of any proceedings involving the attorney general. This modification is expected to enhance accountability among landlords and discourage discriminatory practices in rental decisions.

Summary

Bill A08245 seeks to amend the real property law in New York by introducing new penalties for landlords who refuse to rent to potential tenants based on their involvement in past landlord-tenant disputes. This legislation aims to protect tenants from discrimination linked to their previous rental history, particularly in cases where they may have faced eviction or legal actions. By allowing tenants to file suit against landlords who violate this provision, the bill intends to provide injured tenants with a clear path to seek justice, including the possibility of temporary and permanent injunctive relief as well as damages.

Contention

During the discussions surrounding A08245, there have been notable concerns from landlord associations who argue that the bill could lead to increased litigation and potential abuse of the legal system. Critics of the measure express worries that it may incentivize speculative lawsuits from tenants attempting to exploit the new legal framework. Proponents, on the other hand, assert that the bill serves to empower tenants and uphold the principle of fair access to housing, especially for those disadvantaged by their rental history. The debate highlights a fundamental tension between protecting tenant rights and the autonomy of landlords in making rental decisions.