New York Assembly Bill A08346

New York 2025-2026 Regular Session

• Introduced: 5/13/25
• Refer: 5/13/25

Caption

Expands mechanic's liens on real property to include certain legal work for attorneys and design work for engineers and architects which relates to permits and zoning approvals for such real property.

Impact

The implications of A08346 could be significant within the realm of property law in New York State. By expanding the category of professionals who can file a mechanic's lien, the bill potentially increases protection for legal and design professionals, thus empowering them with greater leverage to secure payment for their work. This could incentivize attorneys, architects, and engineers to participate more actively in property developments, knowing that they have legal recourse should payments be disputed or delayed. However, this could also lead to an increase in the number of liens filed, which may complicate property transactions.

Summary

A08346 is a legislative bill introduced in New York that aims to amend the existing lien law related to mechanics' liens on real property. The bill expands the existing definition of who can claim a mechanic's lien to include not just contractors and laborers, but also attorneys, engineers, and architects who provide services related to obtaining permits and zoning approvals for real property. This change is intended to ensure that those who contribute to the improvement or design of real estate are assured legal recourse for unpaid work.

Contention

Notable points of contention surrounding A08346 may stem from concerns about the potential overreach of expanding the mechanic's lien provisions. Critics might argue that allowing such professionals to file liens could lead to unnecessary disputes and complications in property dealings. There may also be apprehension regarding the implications for property owners, who could find themselves facing multiple liens from various service providers, complicating the financial and legal landscape of property development. Stakeholders will likely want to ensure that the balance between protecting service providers and not hindering property transactions is maintained.