New York Assembly Bill A08810

New York 2025-2026 Regular Session

• Introduced: 6/9/25
• Refer: 6/9/25

Caption

Provides for children who were under the age of 25 when the death of the member occurred to receive an accidental death benefit for their lifetimes.

Impact

The introduction of A08810 is anticipated to have significant implications for the New York City municipality, particularly regarding pension funding and fiscal responsibilities associated with surviving family members of deceased employees. The bill's passage could lead to an increase in employer contributions to funding these benefits, projecting a long-term fiscal impact seen in the anticipated increases of contributions to the pension funds of city employees. Moreover, the bill modifies the scope of who may claim benefits by allowing previously disqualified individuals (e.g., children who aged out of benefits) to apply within a year of the bill’s enactment.

Summary

Bill A08810 proposes to amend the general municipal law to extend Special Accidental Death Benefits to children of deceased members of certain municipal departments. Specifically, it aims to ensure that surviving children, who were under the age of 25 at the time of the accident, can receive these benefits for the duration of their lifetime, under specified conditions. This amendment applies to members of police and fire departments within New York City's retirement systems, enhancing the financial security provided to families affected by the tragic loss of a parent. Notably, it also includes provisions to prevent reductions in benefits unless consent is provided by existing beneficiaries, which is designed to protect the rights of current retirees and their families.

Contention

While proponents argue it is a necessary step to provide extended support to children who lose a parent on duty, there are concerns regarding the increased financial burden on municipality pension funds and the implications for future budgeting. Critics argue that increasing these liabilities may impact city finances and suggest the need for a thorough review of the long-term effects on the retirement systems responsible for managing these benefits. Additionally, contrasting opinions exist around the fairness of altering benefits for existing pensioners if it comes at the cost to their accrued rights.