Ohio House Bill HB146

Ohio 2023-2024 Regular Session

• Introduced: 4/4/23
• Report Pass: 5/22/23

Caption

Establish a SERS contribution based benefit cap

Impact

The primary impact of HB146 will be on the retirement benefits that school employees receive from SERS. The enactment of this cap means that employees' benefits may not only be calculated based on their contributions but will now also be adjusted according to the designated cap. This may lead to lower retirement allowances for certain members who previously expected larger benefits based on their contributions and service time. The overarching goal is to ensure financial sustainability within the retirement system, potentially affecting the long-term viability of SERS given changing demographics and financial pressures.

Summary

House Bill 146 introduces a contribution-based benefit cap (CBBC) to the School Employees Retirement System (SERS) for members calculated upon their retirement benefits. This bill stipulates that if a member's calculated retirement allowance exceeds the established CBBC, their retirement benefits will be reduced to align with this cap. The cap is designed to regularize benefits based on actuarial advice, and its implementation is targeted for August 1, 2024, marking a significant change in the retirement calculations for school employees in Ohio.

Sentiment

Overall sentiment surrounding the bill appears to be supportive among those prioritizing fiscal responsibility and the sustainability of retirement systems. Proponents argue that the measure is necessary to address potential funding gaps that could arise as member demographics shift. Conversely, dissenters may raise concerns about the adequacy of retirement benefits and the implications for those close to retirement who could see their expected benefits curtailed significantly, leading to criticism that the bill may not sufficiently consider the needs of current employees.

Contention

Notable points of contention include concerns about how this cap might disproportionately affect long-serving employees who have contributed significantly to the system. Critics argue that the bill could reduce the quality of retirement that dedicated educators receive after years of service. Additionally, discussions around the appropriateness of the board's power to adjust the CBBC based on actuarial advice have been raised, suggesting a need for transparency and oversight in how these decisions are made. The balance between sustainability of the pension fund and the promised benefits to employees remains a critical aspect of the ongoing debate.