Ohio 2025 2025-2026 Regular Session

Ohio House Bill HB108 Introduced / Bill

                    As Introduced
136th General Assembly
Regular Session	H. B. No. 108
2025-2026
Representative Williams
A B I L L
To amend section 2901.05 of the Revised Code to 
enact the Self-Defense Protection Act to create 
a pretrial procedure for a person asserting 
self-defense, defense of another, or defense of 
that person's property.
BE IT ENACTED BY THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF THE STATE OF OHIO:
Section 1. That section 2901.05 of the Revised Code be 
amended to read as follows:
Sec. 2901.05. (A) Every person accused of an offense is 
presumed innocent until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt, 
and the burden of proof for all elements of the offense is upon 
the prosecution. The burden of going forward with the evidence 
of an affirmative defense, and the burden of proof, by a 
preponderance of the evidence, for an affirmative defense other 
than self-defense, defense of another, or defense of the 
accused's residence presented as described in division (B)(1) of 
this section, is upon the accused.
(B)(1) A person is allowed to act in self-defense, defense 
of another, or defense of that person's residence. 
(a) A person who is accused of an offense that involved 
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19 H. B. No. 108 Page 2
As Introduced
the person's use of self-defense, defense of another, or defense 
of that person's residence may file a pretrial motion asserting 
that the accused person acted in self-defense, defense of 
another, or defense of that person's residence and requesting 
that the court establish a rebuttable presumption that the 
accused person acted in self-defense, defense of another, or 
defense of that person's residence.
(b) If the accused person described in division (B)(1)(a) 
of this section files a pretrial motion, the court shall hold a 
pretrial hearing. If, at the pretrial hearing of the person who 
is accused of an offense that involved the person's use of force 
against another, there is evidence presented that tends to 
support by a preponderance of the evidence that the accused 
person used the force in self-defense, defense of another, or 
defense of that person's residence, the court shall grant the 
pretrial motion.
(c) If the court grants the pretrial motion, at the trial 
of the accused person there is a rebuttable presumption that the 
accused person acted in self-defense, defense of another, or 
defense of that person's residence. The prosecution has the 
burden to rebut this presumption by proving beyond a reasonable 
doubt that the accused person did not use the force in self-
defense, defense of another, or defense of that person's 
residence, as the case may be.
(d) If a person who is accused of an offense that involved 
the person's use of self-defense, defense of another, or defense 
of that person's residence does not file a pretrial motion 
described in division (B)(1)(a) of this section, or the person 
files a pretrial motion described in division (B)(1)(a) of this 
section, but the court denies the pretrial motion, at the trial 
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49 H. B. No. 108 Page 3
As Introduced
of the accused person there is no rebuttable presumption that 
the accused person acted in self-defense, defense of another, or 
defense of that person's residence. However, at the trial of the 
accused person, the person is not precluded from asserting that 
the accused person acted in self-defense, defense of another, or 
defense of that person's residence.
(e) If the accused person described in division (B)(1)(d) 
of this section asserts that the accused person acted in self-
defense, defense of another, or defense of that person's 
residence, and if at the trial of a person who is accused of an 
offense that involved the person's use of force against another, 
there is evidence presented that tends to support by a 
preponderance of the evidence that the accused person used the 
force in self-defense, defense of another, or defense of that 
person's residence, the prosecution must prove beyond a 
reasonable doubt that the accused person did not use the force 
in self-defense, defense of another, or defense of that person's 
residence, as the case may be.
(2) Subject to division (B)(3) of this section, a person 
is presumed to have acted in self-defense or defense of another 
when using defensive force that is intended or likely to cause 
death or great bodily harm to another if the person against whom 
the defensive force is used is in the process of unlawfully and 
without privilege to do so entering, or has unlawfully and 
without privilege to do so entered, the residence or vehicle 
occupied by the person using the defensive force.
(3) The presumption set forth in division (B)(2) of this 
section does not apply if either of the following is true:
(a) The person against whom the defensive force is used 
has a right to be in, or is a lawful resident of, the residence 
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79 H. B. No. 108 Page 4
As Introduced
or vehicle.
(b) The person who uses the defensive force uses it while 
in a residence or vehicle and the person is unlawfully, and 
without privilege to be, in that residence or vehicle.
(4) The presumption set forth in division (B)(2) of this 
section is a rebuttable presumption and may be rebutted by a 
preponderance of the evidence, provided that the prosecution's 
burden of proof remains proof beyond a reasonable doubt as 
described in divisions (A) and (B)(1) of this section.
(C) As part of its charge to the jury in a criminal case, 
the court shall read the definitions of "reasonable doubt" and 
"proof beyond a reasonable doubt," contained in division (E) of 
this section.
(D) As used in this section:
(1) An "affirmative defense" is either of the following:
(a) A defense expressly designated as affirmative;
(b) A defense involving an excuse or justification 
peculiarly within the knowledge of the accused, on which the 
accused can fairly be required to adduce supporting evidence.
(2) "Dwelling" means a building or conveyance of any kind 
that has a roof over it and that is designed to be occupied by 
people lodging in the building or conveyance at night, 
regardless of whether the building or conveyance is temporary or 
permanent or is mobile or immobile. As used in this division, a 
building or conveyance includes, but is not limited to, an 
attached porch, and a building or conveyance with a roof over it 
includes, but is not limited to, a tent.
(3) "Residence" means a dwelling in which a person resides 
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107 H. B. No. 108 Page 5
As Introduced
either temporarily or permanently or is visiting as a guest.
(4) "Vehicle" means a conveyance of any kind, whether or 
not motorized, that is designed to transport people or property.
(E) "Reasonable doubt" is present when the jurors, after 
they have carefully considered and compared all the evidence, 
cannot say they are firmly convinced of the truth of the charge. 
It is a doubt based on reason and common sense. Reasonable doubt 
is not mere possible doubt, because everything relating to human 
affairs or depending on moral evidence is open to some possible 
or imaginary doubt. "Proof beyond a reasonable doubt" is proof 
of such character that an ordinary person would be willing to 
rely and act upon it in the most important of the person's own 
affairs.
Section 2. That existing section 2901.05 of the Revised 
Code is hereby repealed.
Section 3. This act shall be known as the Self-Defense 
Protection Act.
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124