Oklahoma 2022 2022 Regular Session

Oklahoma House Bill HB4078 Introduced / Bill

Filed 01/20/2022

                     
 
Req. No. 8615 	Page 1  1 
2 
3 
4 
5 
6 
7 
8 
9 
10 
11 
12 
13 
14 
15 
16 
17 
18 
19 
20 
21 
22 
23 
24 
  
STATE OF OKLAHOMA 
 
2nd Session of the 58th Legislature (2022 ) 
 
HOUSE BILL 4078 	By: Wallace 
 
 
 
 
 
AS INTRODUCED 
 
An Act relating to courts; defining terms; creating 
the Office of Judicial Performance Evaluation ; 
providing purpose of Office; creating Director 
position; prescribing duties of Director; prescribing 
duties and powers of Office; prescribing criteria for 
judicial performance evaluations; requiring initial 
evaluation; requiring interim evaluation; allowing 
response from Justice or judge; requiring retention-
year evaluation; allowing response from Justice or 
judge; requiring certain information be published on 
website; authorizing improvement plans; prescribing 
process; providing for conflicts of interest; 
providing recusal process for certain persons; 
requiring information be kept confidentia l; exempting 
certain information from confidentiality; requiring 
Office to publish on website certain information; 
prescribing Council on Judicial Complaints duties and 
powers; providing for codification; and providing an 
effective date. 
 
 
 
 
BE IT ENACTED BY THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF OKLAHOMA: 
SECTION 1.     NEW LAW     A new section of law to be codified 
in the Oklahoma Statutes as Section 1671 of Title 20, unless there 
is created a duplication in numbering, reads as follows: 
As used in this act:   
 
Req. No. 8615 	Page 2  1 
2 
3 
4 
5 
6 
7 
8 
9 
10 
11 
12 
13 
14 
15 
16 
17 
18 
19 
20 
21 
22 
23 
24 
  
1.  "Attorney" means a person admitted to practice law before 
the courts of this state; 
2.  "Improvement plan" means an individual judicial improvement 
plan developed and implemented pursuan t to Section 7 of this act; 
3.  "Interim evaluation" means an interim evaluation conducted 
by the Office of Judicial Performance Evaluation pursuant to Section 
5 of this act during a full term of office of a Justice or judge; 
4.  "Judge" includes all active district judges, associate 
district judges, special judges, Judges of the Oklahoma Court of 
Criminal Appeals, and Judges of the Oklahoma Court of Civil Appeals; 
5.  "Justice" means a Justice of the Oklahoma Supreme Court; 
6.  "Retention-year evaluation" means a judicial performance 
evaluation conducted by the Office of Judicial Performance 
Evaluation pursuant to Section 6 of this act of a Justice or judge 
whose term is to expire and who must stand for retention election ; 
and 
7.  "Volunteer courtroom obser ver program" means a statewide 
program comprised of volunteers who provide courtroom observation 
reports for use by the Office of Judicial Performance Evaluation in 
judicial performance evaluations. 
SECTION 2.     NEW LAW     A new section of law to be codified 
in the Oklahoma Statutes as Se ction 1672 of Title 20, unless there 
is created a duplication in numbering, reads as follows:   
 
Req. No. 8615 	Page 3  1 
2 
3 
4 
5 
6 
7 
8 
9 
10 
11 
12 
13 
14 
15 
16 
17 
18 
19 
20 
21 
22 
23 
24 
  
A.  There is hereby created within the Council o n Judicial 
Complaints the Office of Judicial Performance Evalu ation.  The 
purpose of the Office shall be to: 
1.  Provide Justices and judges with useful information 
concerning their own performances; 
2.  Provide persons voting on the retention of Justices and 
judges with fair, responsible, and constructive informatio n about 
individual judicial performance; and 
3.  Conduct statewide judicial performance evaluations using 
uniform criteria and procedures pursuant to the provisions of this 
act. 
B.  There is created the position of Director to the Office of 
Judicial Performance Evaluation who shall be a state empl oyee hired 
by the Council on Judicial Complaints .  The Director, operations, 
and staffing of the Office shall be overseen by the Administrative 
Director to the Council on Judicial Complaints. 
C.  The Director shall notify the members of the Council of the 
number of completed performance evaluation s ready for review and 
consideration by the Council five (5) days before the Council 's 
regular meeting.  The Director shall attend meetings of the Council 
concerning performance evaluations and bu siness of the Office , keep 
records concerning performance evaluations, prepare reports required 
by statute, and perform other tasks as the Council shall direct.   
 
Req. No. 8615 	Page 4  1 
2 
3 
4 
5 
6 
7 
8 
9 
10 
11 
12 
13 
14 
15 
16 
17 
18 
19 
20 
21 
22 
23 
24 
  
SECTION 3.     NEW LAW     A new section of law to be c odified 
in the Oklahoma Statutes as Section 1673 of Title 20, unless there 
is created a duplication in numbering, reads a s follows: 
A.  The Office of Judicial Performance Evaluation shall: 
1.  Train members of the Council on Judicial Complaints as 
needed and requested to fulfil the duties established pursuant to 
Section 11 of this act; 
2.  Collect and disseminate data on jud icial performance 
evaluations, including judicial performance surveys developed, 
collected, and distributed, pursuant to paragraph 6 of subsection B 
of this section; 
3.  Conduct public education eff orts concerning the judicial 
performance evaluation proces s and the recommendations made by the 
office and the Council on Judicial Complaints ; 
4.  Measure public awareness of the judicial perfo rmance 
evaluation process through regular polling; and 
5.  Perform other tasks as the Council on Judicial Complaints 
shall direct. 
B.  The Office of Judicial Performance Evaluation shall have the 
following powers and duties to: 
1.  Review any available case management data and statistics 
related to individual J ustices and judges; 
2.  Review written judicial opinions and orde rs authorized by 
Justices and judges;   
 
Req. No. 8615 	Page 5  1 
2 
3 
4 
5 
6 
7 
8 
9 
10 
11 
12 
13 
14 
15 
16 
17 
18 
19 
20 
21 
22 
23 
24 
  
3.  Collect information from courtroom observation of Justices 
and judges as well as information provided to the Office by the 
volunteer courtroom observer prog ram; 
4. Interview Justices and judges under the Council on Judicial 
Complaints' oversight; 
5.  Accept information and documentation from interested persons 
as necessary; 
6.  Develop surveys to evaluate the performance of J ustices and 
judges which shall be completed by individuals who interact with the 
Justice or judge including, but not limited, to attorneys, jurors, 
represented and unrepresented litigants, law enforcement personnel, 
attorneys within the district attorneys ' and public defenders ' 
offices, employees of the court, court interpreters, employees of 
probation offices, employees of local departments of social 
services, and victims of crimes; 
7.  Determine the validity of completed surv eys developed 
pursuant paragraph 6 of this subsection, report to the Council on 
the validity of the surveys , and prepare alternatives to surveys 
where sample populations are inadequate to produce valid results; 
8.  Prepare narratives for the Council on Jud icial Complaints 
that reflect the performance of Justices and j udges; 
9. Submit any information concerning or appearing to concern a 
complaint to the Administrative Director of the Council on Judicial 
Complaints;   
 
Req. No. 8615 	Page 6  1 
2 
3 
4 
5 
6 
7 
8 
9 
10 
11 
12 
13 
14 
15 
16 
17 
18 
19 
20 
21 
22 
23 
24 
  
10.  Submit performance evaluations of Jus tices and judges to 
the Council on Judicial Complaints for approval or rejection; 
11.  Recommend, at the staff's discretion after it completes an 
evaluation of a Justi ce or judge pursuant to Section 5 of this act, 
to the Council on Judicial Complaints that it develop an individual 
judicial improvement plan pursuant to Section 7 of this act; and 
12.  Develop and maintain a website for the Office of Judicial 
Performance Evaluation . 
SECTION 4.     NEW LAW     A new section of law to be codified 
in the Oklahoma Statutes as Section 1674 of Title 20, unless there 
is created a duplication in numbering, reads as follo ws: 
The Office of Judicial Performance Evaluation shall evaluate 
each Justice and judge in Oklahoma utilizing the powers and duties 
conferred in Section 3 of this act.  The evaluations must only 
include the following performance evaluation criteria: 
1.  Integrity including, but not limited to, whether the Justice 
or judge: 
a. avoids impropriety or the appearance of impropriety, 
b. displays fairness and impartiality toward all 
participants, and 
c. avoids ex parte communications; 
2.  Legal knowledge including , but not limited to, whether the 
Justice or judge:   
 
Req. No. 8615 	Page 7  1 
2 
3 
4 
5 
6 
7 
8 
9 
10 
11 
12 
13 
14 
15 
16 
17 
18 
19 
20 
21 
22 
23 
24 
  
a. demonstrates, through well -reasoned opinions and 
courtroom conduct, an understan ding of substantive law 
and relevant rules of proc edure and evidence, 
b. demonstrates, through well-reasoned opinions and 
courtroom conduct, attentiveness to factual and legal 
issues before the court, and 
c. adheres to precedent or clearly explains the leg al 
basis for departure from precedent and approp riately 
applies statutes or other sources of legal authority; 
3.  Communication skills including, but not limited to, whether 
the Justice or judge: 
a. presents clearly written and understandable opinions, 
findings of fact, conclusions of law, and orders, 
b. presents clearly stated and understandable questions 
or statements during oral arguments or presentations, 
and, for trial judges, clearly explains all oral 
decisions, and 
c. clearly presents information to the jury, as 
necessary; 
4.  Judicial temperament including, but not limited to, whether 
the Justice or judge: 
a. demonstrates courtesy toward attorneys, litigants, 
court staff, and others in the courtroom, and   
 
Req. No. 8615 	Page 8  1 
2 
3 
4 
5 
6 
7 
8 
9 
10 
11 
12 
13 
14 
15 
16 
17 
18 
19 
20 
21 
22 
23 
24 
  
b. maintains and requires order, punctuality, and 
appropriate decorum in the courtroom; 
5. Administrative performance including, but not limited to, 
whether the Justice or judge: 
a. demonstrates preparation for oral arguments, trials, 
and hearings, as well as attentiveness to and 
appropriate control over judicial proceedings, 
b. manages workload and court time effectively and 
efficiently, 
c. issues opinions, findings o f fact, conclusions of law, 
and orders in a timely manner and without unnecessary 
delay, 
d. participates in a proportionate share of th e court's 
workload, takes responsibility for more than his or 
her own caseload, and is willing to assist other 
Justices or judges, and 
e. understands and complies, as necessary, with 
directives of the Oklahoma Supreme Court; and 
6.  Service to the legal pr ofession and the public by 
participating in service-oriented efforts designed to educate the 
public about the legal syste m and improve the legal system. 
SECTION 5.     NEW LAW     A new section of law to be codified 
in the Oklahoma Statutes as Section 1675 of Title 20, unless th ere 
is created a duplication in numbering, reads as follows:   
 
Req. No. 8615 	Page 9  1 
2 
3 
4 
5 
6 
7 
8 
9 
10 
11 
12 
13 
14 
15 
16 
17 
18 
19 
20 
21 
22 
23 
24 
  
A.  Within the first two (2) years of a Justice's or judge's 
appointment to the bench, the Office of Judicial Performance 
Evaluation shall conduct an initial evaluation of each J ustice and 
judge.  The Office shall complete and communicate the initial 
evaluations, including any recommendations for improvement plans, to 
the Council on Judicial Complaints for approval or rejection .  Once 
approved, the Office sha ll communicate the initial evaluation to the 
Justice or judge. 
B. Within two (2) years of the approval of the initial 
evaluation of a Justice or judge by the Council, the Office shall 
conduct an interim evaluation of each J ustice and judge.  The Office 
shall complete and communicate the interim e valuations, including 
any recommendations for improvement plans, to the Council on 
Judicial Complaints for approval or rejection. Once approved, the 
Office shall communicate the interim evaluation to the Justice o r 
judge 
C.  The Council shall grant each J ustice or judge who receives 
an initial and interim evaluation the opportunity to meet with the 
Council or otherwise respond to the initial or interim evaluation no 
later than ten (10) days following the J ustice's or judge's receipt 
of the initial or interim evaluation.  If a meeting is held or a 
response is made, the Council may revise the initial or interim 
evaluation as it sees fit.   
 
Req. No. 8615 	Page 10  1 
2 
3 
4 
5 
6 
7 
8 
9 
10 
11 
12 
13 
14 
15 
16 
17 
18 
19 
20 
21 
22 
23 
24 
  
SECTION 6.     NEW LAW     A new section of law to be codified 
in the Oklahoma Statutes as Section 1676 of Title 20, unless there 
is created a duplication in numbering, reads as follows: 
A.  The Office of Judicial Performance Evaluation shall conduct 
a retention-year evaluation for each Justice or judge whose term is 
to expire and who must stand for retention el ection. 
B.  1.  The Office shall complete a retention-year evaluation 
and related narrative to be approved by the Council.  Once approved, 
the retention-year evaluation shall be communicated to the Justice 
or judge no later than forty -five (45) days prior to the last day 
available for the Justice or judge to declare his or her inten t to 
stand for retention. 
2.  The narrative prepared for a retention -year evaluation must 
include an assessment of the Justice 's or judge's strengths and 
weaknesses with respect t o the judicial performance criteria 
contained in Section 4 of this act, a discussion regarding any 
deficiency identified in an initial or interim evaluation prepared 
pursuant to Section 5 of this act, a review of any improvement plan 
developed pursuant to Section 7 of this act, and a statement of 
whether the Council concludes that any deficiency identified has 
been satisfactorily addressed, or a statement from the Council that 
an improvement plan, if any, was sati sfactorily followed by the 
Justice or judge.   
 
Req. No. 8615 	Page 11  1 
2 
3 
4 
5 
6 
7 
8 
9 
10 
11 
12 
13 
14 
15 
16 
17 
18 
19 
20 
21 
22 
23 
24 
  
3.  The Council shall grant each Justice or judge who receives a 
retention-year evaluation the opportunity to meet with the Council 
or otherwise respond to the evaluation no later than ten (10) days 
following his or her receipt of the evaluation. If the meeting is 
held or a response is made, the Council may revise the evaluation as 
it sees fit. 
C.  After the requirements of subsection B of this section are 
met, the Council shall make a recommendation regarding t he 
performance of each Justice or judge w ho declares his or her intent 
to stand for retention.  The recommendations must be stated as 
"meets performance standard " or "does not meet performance 
standard".  For a Justice or judge to receive a designation of "does 
not meet performance standard ", there must be a majority vote by the 
Council members that the particular Justice or judge should receive 
such a recommendation. 
D.  The Office shall publish on its website the narrative, the 
recommendation, and any oth er relevant information related to a 
retention-year evaluation to the public no later than two (2) months 
prior to the retention election. 
SECTION 7.     NEW LAW     A new section of law to be codified 
in the Oklahoma Statutes as Section 1677 of Title 20, unless there 
is created a duplication in numbering, reads as follows: 
A.  1.  If the Office of Judicial P erformance Evaluation 
recommends, pursuant to Section 5 of this act, that a J ustice or   
 
Req. No. 8615 	Page 12  1 
2 
3 
4 
5 
6 
7 
8 
9 
10 
11 
12 
13 
14 
15 
16 
17 
18 
19 
20 
21 
22 
23 
24 
  
judge receive an improvement plan, the Council shall determine 
whether an individua l judicial improvement plan is appropriate.  If 
the Council determines an improvement plan is appropriate, the 
Office shall then develop an improvement plan for such Justice or 
judge.  After the Council reviews and approves the improvement plan, 
the Office shall have the responsibility for implementing and 
overseeing the improvement plan. 
2.  Once the Justice or judge has completed the improvement 
plan, the Office shall convey the results of the improvement plan  
to the Council.  The Office shall maintain a copy of th e improvement 
plan and the results in its files. 
B.  If a Justice or judge is required to complete an improvement 
plan pursuant to this section, and he or she fails to satisfactorily 
complete the requirements o f such improvement plan, the Council 
shall automatically issue a "does not meet performance standard" 
designation on his or her performance evaluation . 
SECTION 8.     NEW LAW     A new section of law to be codified 
in the Oklahoma Statutes as Section 1678 of Title 20, unless there 
is created a duplication in numbering, reads as follows: 
A.  A member of the Co uncil on Judicial Complaints or an 
employee of the Office of Judicial Performance Evaluation shall 
disclose any professional or personal relationship with a J ustice or 
judge that may affect an unbiased evaluation of the Justice or 
judge, including involvem ent with any litigation involving the   
 
Req. No. 8615 	Page 13  1 
2 
3 
4 
5 
6 
7 
8 
9 
10 
11 
12 
13 
14 
15 
16 
17 
18 
19 
20 
21 
22 
23 
24 
  
Justice or judge and the member or employee, the member's or 
employee's family, or the member's or employee's financial 
interests.  The Council may require, by a vote, the recusal of one 
of its members or the Office's employee because of a relationship 
with a Justice or judge. 
B.  A Justice or judge who is being evaluated by the Office may 
not recuse himself or herself from a case solely on the bas is that 
an attorney, party, or witness in the case is a member of the 
Council on Judicial Complaints or an employee of the Office of 
Judicial Performance Evaluation . 
SECTION 9.     NEW LAW     A new section of law to be codified 
in the Oklahoma Statutes as Section 1679 of Title 20, unless there 
is created a duplication in numbering, reads as follows: 
A.  1.  Except as provided in subsection C of this section or 
specifically provided by law , all self-evaluations, personal 
information, oral or written information, content of any improvement 
plans, and any matter di scussed by the Council on Judicial 
Complaints concerning a performance evaluation is confidential. 
2.  Except as provided by subsection D of this section, a ll 
surveys must allow for the participant's name to remain confidential 
and comments in surveys are confidential but may be summarized in 
aggregate for use in perfo rmance evaluation narratives.   
 
Req. No. 8615 	Page 14  1 
2 
3 
4 
5 
6 
7 
8 
9 
10 
11 
12 
13 
14 
15 
16 
17 
18 
19 
20 
21 
22 
23 
24 
  
3.  Members of the Council on Judicial Complaints and employees 
of the Office of Judicial P erformance Evaluation shall not publicly 
discuss the performance evaluation of a particular J ustice or judge. 
B.  Except as provided in subsection C of this section, all 
recommendations and narratives are c onfidential until released to 
the public on the fi rst day following the deadline for Justices and 
judges to declare their intent to stand for retention. 
C.  Information required to be kept confidential pursuant to 
this section may be released only with the consent of the Justice or 
judge being evaluated. 
D.  Information obtained in surveys shall be kept confidential 
unless the information contains a specific complaint or other 
information constituting a complaint concerning a specific Justice 
or judge in which case the information including the participant 's 
name shall be submitted to the Administrative Director of the 
Council on Judicial Complaints. 
SECTION 10.     NEW LAW     A new section of law to be codified 
in the Oklahoma Statutes as Se ction 1680 of Title 20, unless there 
is created a duplication in numbering, reads as follows: 
The Office of Judicial Perf ormance Evacuation shall gather and 
maintain statewide data and post a statistical report of the 
statewide data on its website no later than thirty (30) days prior 
to each retention el ection.  The report must specify, at a minimum:   
 
Req. No. 8615 	Page 15  1 
2 
3 
4 
5 
6 
7 
8 
9 
10 
11 
12 
13 
14 
15 
16 
17 
18 
19 
20 
21 
22 
23 
24 
  
1.  The total number of Justices and judges who were eligible to 
stand for retention and the number who declared their intent to 
stand for reelection; 
2.  The total number of judicial performance evaluations o f 
Justices and judges performed by the Office of Judicial Performance 
Evaluation; 
3.  The total number of J ustices and judges who were evaluated 
but did not stand for retention; and 
4.  The total number of Justices and judges who received a 
"meets performance standard" or "does not meet performance standard" 
recommendation, respectively. 
SECTION 11.     NEW LAW     A new section of law to be codified 
in the Oklahoma Statutes as Section 1664 of Title 20, unless there 
is created a duplication i n numbering, reads as follows: 
A.  The Council on Judicial Complaints s hall promptly approve or 
reject judicial performance evaluations submit ted by the Office of 
Judicial Performance Evaluation . 
B.  The Council on Judicial Complaints shall have the powers and 
duties to: 
1.  Promulgate rules concerning: 
a. the performance evaluation of Justices and judges by 
the Office of Judicial Performance Evaluation based on 
performance evaluation criteria set forth in S ection 4 
of this act, and   
 
Req. No. 8615 	Page 16  1 
2 
3 
4 
5 
6 
7 
8 
9 
10 
11 
12 
13 
14 
15 
16 
17 
18 
19 
20 
21 
22 
23 
24 
  
b. the creation of a standards matrix or scorecard 
related to the performance evaluation criter ia set 
forth in Section 4 of this act; 
2.  Promulgate rules, guidelines, and procedures concerning a 
statewide volunteer courtroom obse rver program as defined in  
Section 1 of this act; 
3.  Review data, prepared narratives, and recommendations made 
by the Office of Judicial Performance Evaluation ; 
4.  Approve or reject the performance evaluations of Justices 
and judges submitted by the Office of Judicial Performance 
Evaluation; 
5.  Vote as to whether the Justice or judge meets the 
performance standard based upon the member's review of all the 
information available to the Council and the Office's performance 
evaluation; and 
6.  Determine whether information submit ted during the 
performance evaluation p rocess shall be deemed a complaint. 
SECTION 12.  This act shall become effective November 1, 2022. 
 
58-2-8615 AQH 01/20/22