Oklahoma 2024 2024 Regular Session

Oklahoma House Bill HB3862 Amended / Bill

Filed 02/16/2024

                     
 
HB3862 HFLR 	Page 1 
BOLD FACE denotes Committee Amendments.  1 
2 
3 
4 
5 
6 
7 
8 
9 
10 
11 
12 
13 
14 
15 
16 
17 
18 
19 
20 
21 
22 
23 
24 
  
HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES - FLOOR VERSION 
 
STATE OF OKLAHOMA 
 
2nd Session of the 59th Legislature (2024) 
 
HOUSE BILL 3862 	By: Ford 
 
 
 
 
 
AS INTRODUCED 
 
An Act relating to health insurance; defining terms; 
providing for disclosure and review of prior 
authorization requirements; providing who shall make 
adverse determinations ; providing for personnel 
qualifications; requiring consultations prior to 
adverse determinations; providing requirements for 
certain physicians; provi ding for retrospective 
denial; providing for exemptions; providing for 
failure to comply; providing for codification; and 
providing an effective date. 
 
 
 
 
 
 
BE IT ENACTED BY THE PEOPLE OF T HE STATE OF OKLAHOMA: 
SECTION 1.     NEW LAW     A new sect ion of law to be codified 
in the Oklahoma Statutes as Se ction 6570.1 of Title 36, unless there 
is created a duplication in numbering, reads as follows: 
As used in this section: 
1.  "Prior authorization" means the process by which utilization 
review entities determine the medical necessity and/or medical 
appropriateness of otherwise covered health care services prior to 
the rendering of such health care services.  Prior authorization   
 
HB3862 HFLR 	Page 2 
BOLD FACE denotes Committee Amendments.  1 
2 
3 
4 
5 
6 
7 
8 
9 
10 
11 
12 
13 
14 
15 
16 
17 
18 
19 
20 
21 
22 
23 
24 
  
also includes any he alth insurer's or utilization review entity 's 
requirement that an enrollee or health care provider notify the 
health insurer or utilization review entity prior to providing a 
health care service; and 
2.  "Utilization review entity " means an individual or entity 
that performs prior authorization for an: 
a. insurer that writes health insurance policies , and 
b. a preferred provider organization, health maintenance 
organization, or exclusive provider organization. 
SECTION 2.     NEW LAW     A new section of law to be codified 
in the Oklahoma Statut es as Section 6570.2 of Title 36, unless there 
is created a duplication in numbering, reads as follows: 
A.  A utilization review entity shall make any current prior 
authorization requirements and restrictions readily accessible on 
its website to enrollees, health care professionals, and the general 
public.  This includes the written clinical criteria.  Requirements 
shall be described in detail but also in easily understandable 
language. 
B.  If a utilization review entity intends either to implement a 
new prior authorization requirement or restriction or amend an 
existing requirement or restriction, the utilization re view entity 
shall ensure that the new or amended requirement is not implemented 
unless the utilization review entity 's website has been updated t o 
reflect the new or amended requirement or restriction .   
 
HB3862 HFLR 	Page 3 
BOLD FACE denotes Committee Amendments.  1 
2 
3 
4 
5 
6 
7 
8 
9 
10 
11 
12 
13 
14 
15 
16 
17 
18 
19 
20 
21 
22 
23 
24 
  
C.  If a utilization review entity intends either to impl ement a 
new prior authorization requirement or restriction or amend an 
existing requirement or restriction, the utilization review entity 
shall provide health care providers of enrollees written not ice of 
the new or amended requirement or amendment no les s than sixty (60) 
days before the requirement or restriction is implemented. 
SECTION 3.     NEW LAW     A new section of law t o be codified 
in the Oklahoma Statutes as Section 6570.3 of Title 36, unless there 
is created a duplication in numbering, reads as follows: 
A.  A utilization review entity must ensure that all adverse 
determinations are made by a physician. 
1.  The physician must: 
a. possess a current and valid non -restricted license to 
practice medicine in the state of Oklahoma , 
b. be of the same specialty as the physician who 
typically manages the medical condition or disease or 
provides the health care service involve d in the 
request, 
c. have experience treating patients with the medical 
condition or disease for which the health care service 
is being requested, and 
d. make the adverse determination under the clinical 
direction of one of the utilization review entity 's 
medical directors who is responsible for the provision   
 
HB3862 HFLR 	Page 4 
BOLD FACE denotes Committee Amendments.  1 
2 
3 
4 
5 
6 
7 
8 
9 
10 
11 
12 
13 
14 
15 
16 
17 
18 
19 
20 
21 
22 
23 
24 
  
of health care services provided to enrollees of 
Oklahoma. 
SECTION 4.     NEW LAW     A new section of law to be codified 
in the Oklahoma Statutes as Section 6570.4 of Title 36, unless there 
is created a duplication in numbering, reads as follow s: 
If a utilization review entity is questioning the medical 
necessity of a health care service, the utilization revie w entity 
must notify the enrollee 's physician that medical necessity is bei ng 
questioned.  Prior to issuing an adverse determination, the 
enrollee's physician must have the opportunity to discuss the 
medical necessity of the health care service on the telep hone with 
the physician who will be responsible for determining authorizati on 
of the health care service under review. 
SECTION 5.     NEW LAW     A new section of law to be codified 
in the Oklahoma Statutes as Section 6570.5 of Title 36, unless there 
is created a duplication in numbering, reads as follows: 
A.  A utilization review entity must ensure that all appeals are 
reviewed by a physician. 
1.  The physician must: 
a. possess a current and valid non -restricted license to 
practice medicine in Oklahoma, 
b. be currently in active practice in the same or similar 
specialty as a physician who typically manages the   
 
HB3862 HFLR 	Page 5 
BOLD FACE denotes Committee Amendments.  1 
2 
3 
4 
5 
6 
7 
8 
9 
10 
11 
12 
13 
14 
15 
16 
17 
18 
19 
20 
21 
22 
23 
24 
  
medical condition or disease for at least five (5) 
consecutive years, 
c. be knowledgeable of, and have experience providing, 
the health care services under appeal , 
d. not be employed by a utilization revie w entity or be 
under contract with the utilization review entity 
other than to participate in one or more of the 
utilization review entity 's health care provider 
networks or to perform reviews of appeals, or 
otherwise have any financial interest in the out come 
of the appeal, 
e. not have been directly involved in making the adverse 
determination, and 
f. consider all known clinical aspects of the health 
care, service under review, including , but not limited 
to, a review of all pertinent medical records provi ded 
to the utilization review entity by the enrollee 's 
health care provider, any relevant records provided to 
the utilization review entity by a health care 
facility, and any medical literature provided to the 
utilization review entity by the health care p rovider. 
SECTION 6.     NEW LAW     A new section of law to be codified 
in the Oklahoma Statutes as Section 6570.6 of Title 36, unless there 
is created a duplication in numbering, reads as follows:   
 
HB3862 HFLR 	Page 6 
BOLD FACE denotes Committee Amendments.  1 
2 
3 
4 
5 
6 
7 
8 
9 
10 
11 
12 
13 
14 
15 
16 
17 
18 
19 
20 
21 
22 
23 
24 
  
A.  A utilization review entity m ay not revoke, limit, condition 
or restrict a prior authorization if care i s provided within forty-
five (45) business days from the date the health care provider 
received the prior authorization. 
B.  In the case of preventive care that has prior authorization 
approval, if it has been determined medically necessary by the 
medical provider that additional preventive care is needed, it shall 
be covered under the initial pre -authorization.  For any 
subsequently provided prevent ive care covered by the initial pre -
authorization, it must be in connection to care furnished by the 
medical provider.  Any care provided to an enrollee that is not in 
connection to pre-authorized preventive care shall need to receive 
pre-authorization approval. 
C.  Nothing in this section s hall be construed to require pre-
authorization approval of care that is already exempted from a pre -
authorization approval. 
SECTION 7.     NEW LAW     A new section of law to be codified 
in the Oklahoma Statutes as Section 6570.7 of Title 36, unless there 
is created a duplication in numbering, reads as fol lows: 
A.  A utilization review entity may not require a health care 
provider to complete a prior authorization for a health care service 
in order for the enrollee to whom the service is be ing provided to 
receive coverage if in the most recent 12 -month period, the 
utilization review entity has approved or would have approved not   
 
HB3862 HFLR 	Page 7 
BOLD FACE denotes Committee Amendments.  1 
2 
3 
4 
5 
6 
7 
8 
9 
10 
11 
12 
13 
14 
15 
16 
17 
18 
19 
20 
21 
22 
23 
24 
  
less than eighty percent (80%) of the prior authorization requests 
submitted by the health care provider for that health care service. 
B. A utilization review entity may evaluate wh ether a health 
care provider continues to qualify for exemptions as described in 
subsection A not more than once every twelve (12) months.  Nothing 
in this section requires a utilization re view entity to evaluate an 
existing exemption or prevents a utilizat ion review entity from 
establishing a longer exemption period. 
C.  A health care provider is not required to request an 
exemption in order to qualify for an exemption. 
D.  A health care provider who does not receive an exemption may 
request from the utili zation review entity at any time, but not more 
than once per year per service, evidence to support the utilization 
review entity's decision.  A health care provider may appeal a 
utilization review entity's decision to deny an exemption. 
E.  A utilization review entity may only revoke an exemption at 
the end of the 12-month period if the utilization revi ew entity: 
1.  Makes a determination that the health care provider would 
not have met the eighty percent (80%) approval criteria based on a 
retrospective review of the claims for the particular service for 
which the exemption applies for the previous three (3) months, or 
for a longer period if needed to reach a minimum of ten (10) claims 
for review;   
 
HB3862 HFLR 	Page 8 
BOLD FACE denotes Committee Amendments.  1 
2 
3 
4 
5 
6 
7 
8 
9 
10 
11 
12 
13 
14 
15 
16 
17 
18 
19 
20 
21 
22 
23 
24 
  
2.  Provides the health care provider with the information it 
relied upon in making its determination to revoke the exemption; and 
3.  Provides the health care provider a plain language 
explanation of how to appeal the decision. 
F.  An exemption remains i n effect until the 30th day after the 
date the utilization review en tity notifies the health care provider 
of its determination to revoke the exemption , or if the health care 
provider appeals the determination, the fifth day after the 
revocation is upheld on appeal. 
G.  A determination to revoke or deny an exemption must b e made 
by a health care provider licensed in Oklahoma of the same or 
similar specialty as the health care provider being conside red for 
an exemption and have experience in providing the se rvice for which 
the potential exemption applies. 
H.  A utilization review entity must provide a health care 
provider that receives an exem ption a notice that includes: 
1.  A statement that the hea lth care provider qualifies for an 
exemption from pre-authorization requirements; 
2.  A list of services for which the exemption s apply; and 
3.  A statement of the duration of the exemption. 
I.  A utilization review entity shall not deny or reduce payment 
for a health care service exempted from a prior authorization 
requirement under this section, including a health care service 
performed or supervised by another health care provider when the   
 
HB3862 HFLR 	Page 9 
BOLD FACE denotes Committee Amendments.  1 
2 
3 
4 
5 
6 
7 
8 
9 
10 
11 
12 
13 
14 
15 
16 
17 
18 
19 
20 
21 
22 
23 
24 
  
health care provider who ordered such service received a prior 
authorization exemption, unless the rendering health care provi der: 
1.  Knowingly and materially misrepresented the health care 
service in request for payment submitted to the utilization review 
entity with the specific intent to deceive an d obtain an unlawful 
payment from utilization review entity; or 
2.  Failed to substantially perform the health care service. 
SECTION 8.     NEW LAW     A new section of law to be codified 
in the Oklahoma Statutes as Section 6570.8 of Title 36, unless there 
is created a duplication in numbering, reads as follows: 
Any failure by a utilization review entity to comply with the 
deadlines and other requirements specified in this act will result 
in any health care services subject to review to be automatically 
deemed authorized by the utilization review entity . 
SECTION 9.  This act shall become effective November 1, 2024. 
 
COMMITTEE REPORT BY: COMMITTEE ON INSURANCE, dated 02/13/2024 - DO 
PASS.