Oklahoma 2024 2024 Regular Session

Oklahoma Senate Bill SB1090 Introduced / Bill

Filed 01/19/2023

                     
 
 
Req. No. 1546 	Page 1  1 
2 
3 
4 
5 
6 
7 
8 
9 
10 
11 
12 
13 
14 
15 
16 
17 
18 
19 
20 
21 
22 
23 
24 
   1 
2 
3 
4 
5 
6 
7 
8 
9 
10 
11 
12 
13 
14 
15 
16 
17 
18 
19 
20 
21 
22 
23 
24 
  
STATE OF OKLAHOMA 
 
1st Session of the 59th Legislature (2023) 
 
SENATE BILL 1090 	By: Paxton 
 
 
 
 
 
AS INTRODUCED 
 
An Act relating to appeal of criminal prosecu tions; 
amending 21 O.S. 2021, Section 732 , which relates to 
justifiable homicide by officer; clarifying immunity 
provision for persons asserting certain claim; 
authorizing defendant to file motion to dismiss 
charges under certain circumstances; granting 
defendant the right to file certain interlo cutory 
appeal; establishing procedures for certain appeal 
hearing; defining term; amending 22 O.S. 2021, 
Section 1053, as amended by Section 2, Chapter 209, 
O.S.L. 2022 (22 O.S. Supp. 2022, Section 1053), which 
relates to appeals taken by the state or 
municipality; authorizing appeals by state or 
municipalities under certain circumstances ; and 
providing an effective date . 
 
 
 
 
 
BE IT ENACTED BY THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF OKLAHOMA: 
SECTION 1.     AMENDATORY     21 O.S. 2021, Section 732, is 
amended to read as follows: 
Section 732. A. A peace officer, correctional officer, or any 
person acting by his command in his aid and assistance, is justified 
in using deadly force when:   
 
 
Req. No. 1546 	Page 2  1 
2 
3 
4 
5 
6 
7 
8 
9 
10 
11 
12 
13 
14 
15 
16 
17 
18 
19 
20 
21 
22 
23 
24 
   1 
2 
3 
4 
5 
6 
7 
8 
9 
10 
11 
12 
13 
14 
15 
16 
17 
18 
19 
20 
21 
22 
23 
24 
  
1.  The officer is acting in obedience to and in accordance with 
any judgment of a competent court in executi ng a penalty of death; 
or 
2.  In effecting an arrest or preventing an escape from custody 
following arrest and the officer r easonably believes both that: 
a. such force is necessary to prevent the arrest fro m 
being defeated by resistance or escape, and 
b. there is probable cause to believe that the person to 
be arrested has committed a crime involving the 
infliction or threatene d infliction of serious bodily 
harm, or the person to be arrested is attempting to 
escape by use of a deadly weapon, or otherwise 
indicates that he will endanger human life or inflict 
great bodily harm unless arrested without delay; or 
3.  The officer is i n the performance of his legal duty or the 
execution of legal process and reasonab ly believes the use of the 
force is necessary to p rotect himself or others from the infliction 
of serious bodily harm; or 
4.  The force is necessary to prevent an escape from a penal 
institution or other place of confinement used primarily for the 
custody of persons convicted of felonies or from custody w hile in 
transit thereto or therefrom unless the officer has reason to know: 
a. the person escaping is not a person who has c ommitted 
a felony involving violence, and   
 
 
Req. No. 1546 	Page 3  1 
2 
3 
4 
5 
6 
7 
8 
9 
10 
11 
12 
13 
14 
15 
16 
17 
18 
19 
20 
21 
22 
23 
24 
   1 
2 
3 
4 
5 
6 
7 
8 
9 
10 
11 
12 
13 
14 
15 
16 
17 
18 
19 
20 
21 
22 
23 
24 
  
b. the person escaping is not likely to endanger human 
life or to inflict serious bodily h arm if not 
apprehended. 
B.  1.  An officer who uses deadly force shall not be subject to 
criminal prosecution or civil acti on for the use of such deadly 
force unless the deadly force is determined to be unl awful. 
2.  At least ten (10) days prior to the preliminary hearing in a 
case where an officer has been charged and is subject to criminal 
prosecution for the unlawful use of deadly force, the officer may 
file a motion to dismiss the charges based on a claim that under the 
provisions of this section, the officer is not subject to criminal 
prosecution.  If the court denies the motion to dismiss, the officer 
shall have the right to file an interlocutory appeal on the ruling 
made by the court to the district or associate district court judge 
having jurisdiction over the case. 
3.  The appeal hearing before the district or associate district 
court judge shall address whether the deadly force used by the 
officer was unlawful or justified and permitted pursuant to t he 
provisions of this section. If, after the appeal hearing, the 
district or associate district court judge concludes that the de adly 
force used was justified and permitted under the provisions of this 
section, the judge shall enter a written order containing findings 
of fact and conclusions of law that the officer is not subject to 
criminal prosecution and that criminal charges and proceedings shall   
 
 
Req. No. 1546 	Page 4  1 
2 
3 
4 
5 
6 
7 
8 
9 
10 
11 
12 
13 
14 
15 
16 
17 
18 
19 
20 
21 
22 
23 
24 
   1 
2 
3 
4 
5 
6 
7 
8 
9 
10 
11 
12 
13 
14 
15 
16 
17 
18 
19 
20 
21 
22 
23 
24 
  
be dismissed and shall not be filed unless newly discovered evidence 
or evidence not known to the prosecuti on at the time is found or 
discovered. If, after the appeal hearing, the district or associate 
district court judge concludes that the deadly force used was not 
justified and therefore unlawful, the judge shall enter an order 
binding the officer over for trial. 
4.  As used in this subsection, the term “criminal prosecution” 
includes charging or prosecuting the defendant. 
SECTION 2.     AMENDATORY     22 O.S. 2021, Section 1053, as 
amended by Section 2, Chapter 209, O.S.L. 2022 (22 O.S. Su pp. 2022, 
Section 1053), is amended to read as fol lows: 
Section 1053. Appeals to the Court of Criminal Appeals may be 
taken by the state or a municipality in the fo llowing cases only: 
1.  Upon judgment for the defendant on quashing or setting aside 
an indictment or information; 
2.  Upon an order of the c ourt arresting the judgment; 
3.  Upon a question reserved by the state or a municipality; 
4.  Upon judgment for the defendant on a motion to quash for 
insufficient evidence in a felony matter; 
5.  Upon a pretrial order, decision, or judgment suppressing or 
excluding evidence where appellate revie w of the issue would be in 
the best interests of justice ;   
 
 
Req. No. 1546 	Page 5  1 
2 
3 
4 
5 
6 
7 
8 
9 
10 
11 
12 
13 
14 
15 
16 
17 
18 
19 
20 
21 
22 
23 
24 
   1 
2 
3 
4 
5 
6 
7 
8 
9 
10 
11 
12 
13 
14 
15 
16 
17 
18 
19 
20 
21 
22 
23 
24 
  
6.  Upon a pretrial order, decision or judgment suppressing or 
excluding evidence in cases alleg ing violation of any provisions of 
Section 13.1 of Title 21 of the Oklahoma Statutes ; and 
7. Upon a pretrial order, decision, or judgment finding that a 
defendant is not subje ct to criminal prosecution under the 
provisions of Section 732 of Title 22 of the Oklahoma Statutes; and 
8.  Upon an order, decision or judgment finding that a defendant 
is immune from or not subject to criminal prosecution. 
Priority shall be given to appeals taken pursuant to para graph 
5, 6, or 7, or 8 of this section, and an order staying proceedings 
shall be entered pending the outcome of the appeal. 
SECTION 3.  This act shall become effective November 1, 2023. 
 
59-1-1546 TEK 1/19/2023 2:23:12 PM