Oklahoma Senate Bill SB138

Oklahoma 2024 Regular Session

• Introduced: 2/6/23
• Refer: 2/7/23

Caption

Schools; directing social studies subject matter standards to include certain instruction. Effective date. Emergency.

Impact

The implications of SB138 extend to changing the existing curriculum requirements and standards in public education throughout Oklahoma. By integrating the mandated instruction on the 'Victims of Communism', schools will need to adjust their social studies programs to accommodate this content, thereby potentially influencing the allocation of instructional time and resources. The legislation contemplates revising how history is taught, particularly with a focus on the implications of citizenship and government structures. Furthermore, it encompasses education on essential civil documents and their historical significance, thereby ensuring students understand their rights and responsibilities as citizens.

Summary

Senate Bill 138, introduced in the Oklahoma legislature, aims to amend the state's educational standards by explicitly instructing the State Board of Education to include a mandate for teaching about the 'Victims of Communism' on or around November 7th each year. This bill modifies Section 11-103.6 of the state statutes pertaining to education, emphasizing a need for social studies curriculum to encompass specific historical contexts and documents that highlight the impact of totalitarian regimes, particularly communism. The goal is to ensure students gain a comprehensive understanding of the effects of such ideologies and the significance of democratic values.

Contention

Notably, the bill has sparked discussions around themes of ideological bias in educational content. Supporters argue that highlighting the experiences of victims under communist regimes provides valuable lessons about the risks of totalitarianism and the importance of protecting freedoms. Conversely, opponents raise concerns about the politicization of education, fearing it may lead to an educational environment that stifles critical thinking around diverse perspectives on history. The mandatory teaching about such topics may create a contentious atmosphere in the classroom and could provoke debates about academic freedom and curriculum control.