Oklahoma 2024 2024 Regular Session

Oklahoma Senate Bill SB325 Amended / Bill

Filed 04/10/2024

                     
 
SB325 HFLR 	Page 1 
BOLD FACE denotes Committee Amendments.  1 
2 
3 
4 
5 
6 
7 
8 
9 
10 
11 
12 
13 
14 
15 
16 
17 
18 
19 
20 
21 
22 
23 
24 
  
HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES - FLOOR VERSION 
 
STATE OF OKLAHOMA 
 
2nd Session of the 59th Legislature (2024) 
 
COMMITTEE SUBSTITUTE 
FOR ENGROSSED 
SENATE BILL NO. 325 	By: Daniels of the Senate 
 
  and 
 
  Duel of the House 
 
 
 
COMMITTEE SUBSTITUTE 
 
An Act relating to criminal prosecutions; amending 22 
O.S. 2021, Sections 812.1 and 812.2, which relate to 
the right to speedy trial; modifying time limits for 
conducting certain criminal procee dings; updating 
statutory references; providing time limitation for 
setting trial date; adding and modifying permissible 
grounds for the delay of certain proceedings; 
decreasing time limitation for settin g certain cases 
for review; updating statutory langu age; and 
providing an effective date . 
 
 
 
 
BE IT ENACTED BY THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF OKLAHOMA: 
SECTION 1.     AMENDATORY     22 O.S. 2021, Section 812.1, is 
amended to read as follows: 
Section 812.1 A.  If any person charged with a crim e and held 
in jail solely by reason thereof is not brought to trial within one 
(1) year after arrest nine (9) months after the initial appearance 
by the person on the charge, the court shall set the case for 
immediate review as provided in Section 2 812.2 of this act title,   
 
SB325 HFLR 	Page 2 
BOLD FACE denotes Committee Amendments.  1 
2 
3 
4 
5 
6 
7 
8 
9 
10 
11 
12 
13 
14 
15 
16 
17 
18 
19 
20 
21 
22 
23 
24 
  
to determine if the r ight of the accused to a speedy trial , as 
provided in this section and in Section 812.2 of this t itle, is 
being protected. 
B.  If any person charged with a fe lony crime who is held to 
answer on an appearance bond is not brought to trial within eighteen 
(18) months after arrest the initial appearance, the court shall set 
the case for immediate review as provided in Section 2 812.2 of this 
act, title to determine if the right of the accused to a speedy 
trial is being protected. 
C.  In the event a mistrial is declared or a conviction is 
reversed on appeal, the time lim itations provided for in this 
section shall commence to run from the date the mistrial is declared 
or the date of the mandate of the Court of Criminal Appea ls. 
SECTION 2.     AMENDATORY     22 O.S. 2021, Section 81 2.2, is 
amended to read as follows: 
Section 812.2 A.  Whenever the court finds that a case should 
be reviewed to determin e if the right of an accused to a speedy 
trial is being protected, the court shall: 
1.  Issue notice to the District Attorney district attorney, the 
accused, and the attorney for the accused that the case will be 
reviewed by the court at a date and time wh ich is not less than ten 
(10) days nor more than twenty (2 0) days from the date of the 
notice.  Each party shall have the opportunity to present evidence 
or legal authority in support of its position; and   
 
SB325 HFLR 	Page 3 
BOLD FACE denotes Committee Amendments.  1 
2 
3 
4 
5 
6 
7 
8 
9 
10 
11 
12 
13 
14 
15 
16 
17 
18 
19 
20 
21 
22 
23 
24 
  
2.  Take evidence from both parties regarding the 
appropriateness of the cause for the delay.  At the hearing , the 
court shall consider whether the delay has occurred for any of the 
following reasons: 
a. the extent to which the delay is the result of the 
application of the accused or an attorney on behalf of 
the accused, 
b. the extent to which the delay is the result of the 
fault of the accused or the attorney for the accused, 
c. the accused is incompetent to s tand trial, 
d. a proceeding to determine the competency of the accused 
to stand trial is pending and a determination cannot be 
completed within the time lim itations fixed for trial, 
e. there is material evidence or a material witness which 
is unavailable and that reasonable efforts have been 
made to procure such evidence or witness, and there are 
reasonable grounds to believe t hat such evidence or 
witness can be obtained and trial commenced within a 
reasonable time, 
f. the accused is charged as a codefendan t or 
coconspirator and the court has determined that the 
codefendants or coconspirators must be tried before 
separate juries taken from separate jury panels ,   
 
SB325 HFLR 	Page 4 
BOLD FACE denotes Committee Amendments.  1 
2 
3 
4 
5 
6 
7 
8 
9 
10 
11 
12 
13 
14 
15 
16 
17 
18 
19 
20 
21 
22 
23 
24 
  
g. the court has other cases pending for trial that are 
for persons incarcerated prior to the case in question, 
and the court does not have sufficient time to commence 
the trial of the case within the time limitation fixed 
for trial; provided, the case shall be commenced as 
soon as practicable, 
h. the court, state, accused, or th e attorney for the 
accused is incapable of proceeding to trial due to 
illness or other exigent reason and it is unr easonable 
to reassign the case, and 
i. no court reporter is avai lable for the trial of the 
case; provided, if the delay is pursuant to this 
subparagraph, a court reporter shall be assigned within 
sixty (60) days of the hear ing, and 
j. due to other reasonable grounds the court does not have 
sufficient time to commence the trial of the case 
within the time limit fixed for trial ; provided, the 
court shall commence the trial case as soon thereafter 
as practicable. 
B.  If, after After hearing all the evidence and the legal 
arguments properly submitted, if the court finds by a preponderance 
of the evidence that the state is not proc eeding with due diligence, 
that none of the exceptions set out in paragraph 2 of subsection A 
of this section just ify additional delay and the right of t he   
 
SB325 HFLR 	Page 5 
BOLD FACE denotes Committee Amendments.  1 
2 
3 
4 
5 
6 
7 
8 
9 
10 
11 
12 
13 
14 
15 
16 
17 
18 
19 
20 
21 
22 
23 
24 
  
accused to a speedy trial as provided in this section and Section 
812.1 of this title has been violated, the court shall dismiss the 
case. 
C.  If a preliminary hearing has been held, the case may be 
refiled, unless the applicable statute of limitations has expired, 
upon a showing of newly discover ed evidence which could not have 
been discovered prior to trial, unless the applicable statute of 
limitations has expired. 
D.  If a preliminary hearing has not been held, t he case may be 
refiled, upon good cause shown, unless any applicable statute of 
limitations has expired. 
E.  If, after After hearing all the evidence and the legal 
arguments properly submitted, if the court finds that the right of 
the accused to a speedy t rial has not been violated, the court s hall 
set the case for review in four (4) within three (3) months.  If the 
case is still pending after t he four-month three-month period, the 
court shall conduct another review.  The four-month review of 
pending cases shall be a continuing responsibility of the court 
until final disposition of the cas e. 
SECTION 3.  This act shall become effective November 1, 20 24. 
 
COMMITTEE REPORT BY: COMMITTEE ON JUDICIARY - CRIMINAL, dated 
04/10/2024 - DO PASS, As Amended.