Pennsylvania House Bill HB1079

Pennsylvania 2023-2024 Regular Session

• Introduced: 5/2/23
• Refer: 5/2/23

Caption

In liability and compensation, further providing for schedule of compensation.

Impact

The enactment of HB 1079 would significantly alter the existing framework surrounding workplace injury claims and associated medical treatments in Pennsylvania. By formalizing the reimbursement for medical marijuana, it positions medical marijuana as a legitimate treatment option under the Workers' Compensation Act, which could encourage its wider acceptance in clinical and vocational settings. This legislation aims to help patients, particularly those with debilitating medical conditions, access necessary treatments without facing financial burdens that could arise from out-of-pocket costs associated with their medical regimes.

Summary

House Bill 1079 seeks to amend the Pennsylvania Workers' Compensation Act by providing a reimbursement framework for qualifying patients who use medical marijuana for certified medical purposes. Under the proposed bill, employers would be required to reimburse qualifying patients for their expenses related to medical marijuana, specifically offering dollar-for-dollar reimbursement up to a maximum of $250 per month, with an annual cap of $3,000. Additionally, the bill mandates that insurers set up a reimbursement system for these patients at least quarterly, ensuring a regular and systematic approach to compensation for medical marijuana expenses.

Sentiment

The sentiment around HB 1079 appears to be supportive among proponents of medical marijuana and those advocating for comprehensive healthcare reform. Supporters argue that integrating medical marijuana reimbursement into workers' compensation aligns with contemporary medical practices and acknowledges the legitimacy of medical marijuana as a viable treatment. However, there may also be concerns raised regarding potential costs to employers and the insurance system, leading to a polarized perception among stakeholders.

Contention

A notable contention surrounding HB 1079 may arise from the complexities involved in integrating medical marijuana into workers' compensation, particularly regarding the assessment of what constitutes appropriate use and the administrative burden of tracking reimbursements. Critics may express apprehension over the potential for increased costs to employers and potential inconsistency in reimbursement practices across different insurers. Moreover, there could be ongoing debates regarding the safety and efficacy of medical marijuana in workplace environments and the implications for employee productivity.