Pennsylvania House Bill HB1117

Pennsylvania 2023-2024 Regular Session

• Introduced: 5/5/23
• Refer: 5/5/23

Caption

In firearms and other dangerous articles, further providing for the offense of certain bullets prohibited.

Impact

The passage of HB 1117 is expected to tighten existing laws around the possession and use of armor-piercing ammunition in Pennsylvania. This change aligns state firearms laws with increased safety measures to prevent the misuse of specialized ammunition that can penetrate standard body armor. The bill sets a timeline for individuals currently in possession of armor-piercing bullets to surrender their supplies, allowing law enforcement to manage these dangerous items effectively and aim for broader compliance with the law.

Summary

House Bill 1117 amends Title 18 of the Pennsylvania Consolidated Statutes regarding firearms and defines certain bullets, specifically armor-piercing ammunition, as prohibited. The bill targets individuals who possess, sell, or attempt to use such ammunition while committing violent crimes. The legislation aims to enhance public safety by regulating the possession of potentially dangerous ammunition types. The legislation provides a framework for penalties and legal exceptions related to armor-piercing ammunition, ensuring that it is handled appropriately under law enforcement protocols.

Sentiment

General sentiment around HB 1117 tends to favor enhanced safety regulations within the firearms context. Supporters, including various lawmakers and public safety advocates, believe the bill is a necessary measure to mitigate risks associated with high-capacity ammunition. However, some concerns were raised regarding potential implications for legal gun ownership and the impact on recreational shooters, which were points of contention during discussions surrounding the bill.

Contention

Debate over HB 1117 highlighted a conflict between public safety concerns and the rights of gun owners. While proponents argue that the regulation of armor-piercing ammunition is crucial for reducing violent crime, opponents warn that such measures may infringe on the rights of responsible gun owners and create complications for lawful hunting and sporting activities. These differing viewpoints created a dynamic legislative discourse with advocates on both sides presenting compelling arguments about the balance between safety and personal freedoms.