Pennsylvania House Bill HB1169

Pennsylvania 2023-2024 Regular Session

• Introduced: 5/18/23
• Refer: 5/18/23
• Refer: 5/7/24
• Report Pass: 5/8/24
• Engrossed: 5/8/24
• Refer: 5/17/24

Caption

In powers and duties of the Department of General Services and its departmental administrative and advisory boards and commissions, providing for water bottle filling stations.

Impact

The proposed measures under HB 1169 are expected to have a significant influence on state laws related to public health and environmental conservation. By mandating the installation of water bottle filling stations in state-run buildings and parks, the bill not only aims to increase the availability of drinking water but also targets the reduction of single-use plastics, addressing growing concerns about environmental pollution. Consequently, this bill aligns with broader trends toward sustainability and public health improvements across state initiatives.

Summary

House Bill 1169 aims to enhance the powers and duties of the Department of General Services, specifically focusing on the establishment of water bottle filling stations in public facilities throughout the state. The bill is designed to promote environmental sustainability by encouraging the use of reusable water bottles, thereby reducing plastic waste. Advocates argue that such initiatives are crucial for nurturing a more eco-friendly culture while also enhancing public accessibility to clean drinking water.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HB 1169 has generally been positive among environmentalists and public health advocates who see it as a progressive step towards ensuring clean water access and minimizing plastic waste. However, there are also apprehensions from opponents who express concerns about the financial implications of implementing these stations, particularly regarding installation and maintenance costs, especially in facilities lacking the necessary infrastructure.

Contention

One notable point of contention has been the balance between the perceived benefits of the bill and the fiscal responsibilities that accompany such an initiative. Critics argue that while the intent behind promoting water filling stations is commendable, the state must consider the economic feasibility and potential budget constraints. As the bill progresses through legislative discussion and voting, these debates highlight the complexities involved in environmental legislation and its broader implications for state budget allocations.