Pennsylvania House Bill HB1305

Pennsylvania 2023-2024 Regular Session

• Introduced: 6/2/23
• Refer: 6/2/23
• Refer: 6/7/23
• Report Pass: 6/13/23
• Refer: 6/13/23
• Report Pass: 6/14/23
• Engrossed: 6/14/23
• Refer: 6/29/23

Caption

Providing for behavioral health crisis intervention; and establishing the 988 Fund.

Impact

By implementing this surcharge and creating the 988 Fund, HB 1305 aims to enhance the accessibility and scope of mental health services in Pennsylvania. The funds collected will be appropriated to support various programs focused on crisis intervention and prevention, addressing a recognized gap in behavioral health resources. This legislative change reflects an increased recognition of the importance of mental health in public health policy, potentially leading to more integrated and effective responses to behavioral health crises.

Summary

House Bill 1305 establishes new provisions for behavioral health crisis intervention and creates the 988 Fund, which is designed to support mental health services across the state. The bill introduces a specific surcharge that will be applied to consumers using commercial mobile services or IP-enabled voice services. This surcharge, starting at six cents per transaction in 2024, is intended to generate funds for suicide prevention and behavioral health initiatives, indicating a significant shift toward addressing mental health challenges at the state level.

Sentiment

Overall, the sentiment around HB 1305 has been largely positive among supporters who view the bill as a crucial step towards improving mental health care availability and response times during crises. Advocates argue that the establishment of a dedicated funding source shows a commitment to tackling mental health issues systematically. However, there may be concerns regarding the financial implications of the surcharge on consumers, especially in a time of economic strain, which could raise questions about the bill's reception among the general public.

Contention

While HB 1305 has received considerable support, particularly among mental health advocates and lawmakers concerned with public health, there are notable points of contention regarding the implementation of the surcharge. Opponents may express concern that any additional fees could disproportionately affect low-income consumers, potentially creating barriers to accessing necessary communication services. Additionally, there could be debates about the appropriate management and allocation of the funds derived from the surcharge, ensuring that they are effectively utilized for mental health services as intended.