Pennsylvania House Bill HB1479

Pennsylvania 2023-2024 Regular Session

• Introduced: 6/21/23
• Refer: 6/21/23
• Refer: 6/28/23
• Report Pass: 9/22/23
• Refer: 9/22/23
• Report Pass: 10/2/23
• Refer: 10/2/23
• Report Pass: 10/3/23
• Engrossed: 10/3/23
• Refer: 10/19/23

Caption

In boards and offices, providing for Office of Information Technology.

Impact

The implications of HB 1479 are significant in altering the framework of how technology is managed within state operations. The bill proposes to enhance the capabilities of various government bodies by facilitating a more cohesive information technology strategy. By potentially reallocating resources and responsibility to the Office of Information Technology, the bill aims to promote growth and increase access to technology solutions across the state, which could lead to reduced redundancy and improved service delivery.

Summary

House Bill 1479 focuses on the integration and management of information technology resources across state boards and offices. The bill aims to consolidate efforts within these entities to enable better coordination and improved efficiency in the use of technology. By streamlining operations and standardizing practices, the bill seeks to ensure that state agencies can leverage technology resources more effectively in delivering services to the public.

Sentiment

Feedback from legislative discussions indicates a generally positive sentiment towards the bill, particularly from those who advocate for modernization and enhanced efficiency in government operations. Proponents argue that the bill addresses ongoing issues related to fragmented technology strategies within state agencies. However, there are concerns from some stakeholders about the potential cost implications and the feasibility of implementing a centralized approach to managing technology.

Contention

Notable points of contention regarding HB 1479 include potential pushback from smaller state boards and offices that might argue against the centralization of technology resources. Opponents could voice concerns about the adequacy of support and training provided to local offices as they adapt to new protocols. Additionally, discussions may arise over how effectively this centralized system can address the diverse technology needs of various departments, which may vary widely in scope and function.