Pennsylvania House Bill HB1799

Pennsylvania 2023-2024 Regular Session

• Introduced: 10/27/23
• Refer: 10/27/23
• Refer: 4/10/24
• Report Pass: 4/15/24
• Engrossed: 4/15/24
• Refer: 4/22/24

Caption

Authorizing local taxing authorities to provide for tax exemptions for improvements and redevelopment of shopping malls; establishing the Economic Development and Mixed-Use Redevelopment Advisory Committee within the State Planning Board; and conferring powers and imposing duties on the Department of Community and Economic Development.

Impact

The impact of HB1799 is expected to reshape the landscape of underutilized commercial properties across Pennsylvania, allowing local governments to implement tax incentives for projects that meet specific redevelopment criteria. This may increase the viability of redevelopment projects by reducing upfront costs and potentially enhancing the economic profile of affected areas. The bill mandates that developments adhere to local zoning laws and correct any municipal code violations to qualify for tax exemptions, ensuring that redevelopment initiatives align with community planning objectives.

Summary

House Bill 1799, titled the Economic Development and Mixed-Use Redevelopment of Shopping Malls Act, authorizes local taxing authorities in Pennsylvania to offer tax exemptions aimed at the redevelopment of underutilized shopping malls. The bill is positioned as a response to the economic liability posed by these properties to their surrounding communities. Through these tax exemptions, the act seeks to incentivize the conversion of shopping malls into mixed-use developments that can foster economic growth and community engagement, including the development of attainable housing and public amenities.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HB1799 has been generally supportive among proponents, who see it as a critical measure for revitalizing struggling areas and promoting economic resilience. Supporters argue that the act will not only facilitate business growth but will also foster community-centric development projects. However, some concerns have been raised regarding the fairness of tax exemptions and the potential impacts on local tax revenues, highlighting a divide in perspectives on the implications of such a bill.

Contention

One notable point of contention relates to the balance between economic development and local needs. Critics argue that while the tax incentives may encourage redevelopment, they could also diminish local government revenues, complicating funding for essential services. The bill has provisions that require accountability measures, such as maintaining compliance with local property maintenance codes, but skeptics remain cautious about the long-term effectiveness and sustainability of these redevelopment ventures. The broader debate also touches on the roles of local versus state governance in economic development initiatives.