Pennsylvania House Bill HB1955

Pennsylvania 2023-2024 Regular Session

• Introduced: 1/9/24
• Refer: 1/9/24

Caption

Amending the act of March 4, 1970 (P.L.128, No.49), entitled "An act granting to the Governor of the Commonwealth the sole authority for regulating the display of the flag of the United States from any public ground or building and from any ground or building of certain other institutions," further providing for display of flag.

Impact

If enacted, HB 1955 will reinforce the Governor's regulatory powers over flag display, potentially impacting local ordinances that govern how flags are displayed in communities. This could mean that municipalities will have to align their flag display practices with state regulations, which proponents argue will provide consistency and reduce confusion regarding flag etiquette. However, this shift might also detract from local governance powers, as cities may no longer have the authority to establish their own rules regarding the display of the flag in a way that reflects their community values.

Summary

House Bill 1955 seeks to amend the existing law that grants the Governor of the Commonwealth sole authority over the regulation of the display of the United States flag from public grounds and buildings, as well as from certain other institutions. This bill outlines the parameters under which the flag may be displayed and aims to clarify the responsibilities of local authorities and institutions concerning this regulation. The primary goal is to ensure that the display of the flag adheres to a uniform standard across the state, which supporters believe is essential for state representation and respect towards national symbols.

Sentiment

The sentiment around HB 1955 appears to be moderately supportive among those who see the importance of uniformity in displaying national symbols, particularly in public spaces. Advocates assert that a singular standard is important for fostering respect for the flag and maintaining national pride. Conversely, there may be concerns among some community members regarding the centralization of authority that takes away local autonomy in matters perceived as closely linked to local culture and identity.

Contention

Notable points of contention may arise from discussions around the balance of power between state and local authorities. Critics could argue that while consistency in regulation is important, local governments should retain the ability to regulate flag display in a manner that resonates with their residents. The bill might evoke debates about whether such matters should fall under state jurisdiction or remain within the purview of local governments, highlighting the ongoing tension between state control and local governance.