Pennsylvania House Bill HB2121

Pennsylvania 2023-2024 Regular Session

• Introduced: 3/14/24
• Refer: 3/14/24

Caption

In miscellaneous provisions relating to operation of vehicles, providing for hayride combination crossings.

Impact

If enacted, this bill would directly amend Title 75 (Vehicles) of the Pennsylvania Consolidated Statutes to add regulations specific to hayride operations. By establishing designated crossing protocols, the bill seeks to ensure that hayride operators and local authorities work in tandem to designate safe crossing areas based on traffic volume and environmental factors. This change represents a regulatory shift that prioritizes agricultural and recreational activities alongside traditional vehicle traffic, thereby affecting local governance regarding transportation and safety regulations.

Summary

House Bill 2121 introduces provisions for hayride combination crossings on highways in Pennsylvania, aiming to facilitate the operation of hayrides which are often utilized for amusement and agricultural activities. The bill outlines specific criteria for hayride combinations to safely cross undivided highways, which include requiring the driver to halt before entering the road, ensuring proper visibility, and compliance with traffic regulations. This legislative measure is intended to enhance both safety for participants in hayrides and traffic flow for vehicles on the highways.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HB 2121 appears to be cautiously optimistic, particularly among stakeholders in the agricultural and recreational sectors who support the increased safety measures for hayride operations. While there seems to be a general acknowledgment of the need for clearer regulations, the potential increase in regulatory oversight may raise concerns among some farmers or operators regarding compliance costs and the implications for local Laws. The balance between public safety and operational freedom for hayride operators seems to be a central theme in the discussion.

Contention

Notable points of contention may arise regarding the definitions and conditions set forth for hayride crossings. Issues such as liability concerns and the authority of local agencies to designate crossings could lead to debates among lawmakers and communities. Additionally, some may argue that the specific requirements, such as the need for crossings only on land owned entirely by the same person on both sides, could hinder the operational flexibility necessary for hayride businesses, especially in densely populated or mixed-use areas.