Pennsylvania House Bill HB2198

Pennsylvania 2023-2024 Regular Session

• Introduced: 4/9/24
• Refer: 4/9/24
• Refer: 6/12/24
• Report Pass: 6/26/24
• Refer: 6/26/24
• Report Pass: 6/27/24
• Engrossed: 6/27/24
• Refer: 7/12/24

Caption

In rules of evidence, further providing for subpoena of records.

Impact

If passed, HB 2198 is poised to modify existing state laws governing the access to medical records in several aspects. Notably, the legislation emphasizes patient rights regarding access to their medical information while also delineating appropriate fees that healthcare facilities can charge for record retrieval. This shift is intended to balance the need for patient access with the operational realities of healthcare providers, thus influencing the overall landscape of patient care and legal proceedings involving medical records.

Summary

House Bill 2198 focuses on amending Title 42 of the Pennsylvania Consolidated Statutes, specifically concerning the rules around the subpoena of medical records and the rights of patients to access those records. The bill proposes updates that aim to streamline the process by which healthcare providers must respond to subpoena requests for patient records. Provisions regarding the fees associated with retrieving and reproducing these medical records are also addressed to ensure patients and their representatives can access necessary information without excessive financial burden.

Sentiment

The sentiment around HB 2198 appears to be generally supportive among healthcare advocates who consider it a step forward in enhancing patient rights. Proponents argue that the bill will facilitate greater transparency and ease of access to medical records, which is crucial for patient autonomy and quality of care. However, concerns have been raised regarding the potential financial implications for healthcare providers, particularly in terms of the operational costs associated with complying with the new subpoena standards.

Contention

One notable point of contention is the fee structure outlined in the bill for retrieving medical records. While proponents highlight the importance of not overburdening patients financially, some healthcare providers express concerns over the feasibility of the established fees in terms of covering their administrative costs. This has led to discussions about the balance between patient rights and the economic realities faced by healthcare facilities in compliance with revised subpoena regulations.