Pennsylvania House Bill HB2211

Pennsylvania 2023-2024 Regular Session

• Introduced: 4/15/24
• Refer: 4/15/24

Caption

Providing for prohibited activities related to use of credit history of insured.

Impact

The proposed bill is set to have significant implications on state laws pertaining to insurance practices. By enacting these prohibitions, HB2211 would fundamentally shift how insurers evaluate potential policyholders, moving away from traditional practices that often resulted in higher rates or outright denials based on creditworthiness. The Pennsylvania Department of Insurance would be empowered to enforce compliance and impose penalties for violations, ensuring that the new standards are upheld across the industry. This could result in more stable insurance costs for lower-income families and individuals who previously faced steep premiums due to no fault of their own.

Summary

House Bill 2211 aims to amend Title 40 of the Pennsylvania Consolidated Statutes by prohibiting insurance companies from using credit history as a factor in determining insurance premiums or eligibility for personal and life insurance coverage. This legislation intends to protect consumers from potential discrimination based on their credit scores, thereby promoting equitable access to insurance products. By restricting insurers’ ability to deny or alter coverage based on credit history, the bill seeks to enhance fairness in the insurance market for disadvantaged or low-income individuals who may have poor credit profiles yet still need insurance coverage for essential needs.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HB2211 appears to be broadly supportive among consumer advocacy groups and those concerned about financial equity. Proponents argue that the bill represents a significant step toward consumer protection, particularly for vulnerable populations that may find themselves disenfranchised by existing insurance underwriting practices. However, there may be opposition from insurance providers who argue that using credit history is a legitimate method of assessing risk, and eliminating this consideration could lead to increased costs for the industry overall, which might eventually be passed down to consumers in different forms.

Contention

Notable points of contention likely to arise from the bill's discussions include the balance between risk assessment by insurance companies and consumer protection from discriminatory practices. Opponents may raise concerns including the potential for increased premiums as insurers would lose a valuable tool for predicting risk, incentivizing them to compensate with higher rates for other policyholders. Additionally, the legislation might lead to a debate on the fairness of penalizing insurers for practices viewed as industry standard, juxtaposed against the moral imperative to provide equal access to essential services regardless of financial background.