Pennsylvania House Bill HB2228

Pennsylvania 2023-2024 Regular Session

• Introduced: 4/24/24
• Refer: 4/24/24

Caption

In general provisions relating to criminal proceedings, providing for citizenship status of criminal defendants.

Impact

If enacted, HB2228 would amend Title 42 of the Pennsylvania Consolidated Statutes to formalize the process of reporting non-citizen defendants to federal immigration authorities. This could lead to an increased involvement of ICE in state-level criminal cases, thereby integrating state and federal law enforcement efforts when it comes to undocumented immigrants. Proponents argue this measure can help streamline the criminal justice process while also ensuring immigration laws are upheld through inter-agency cooperation.

Summary

House Bill 2228 focuses on the citizenship status of criminal defendants in Pennsylvania's criminal proceedings. The bill mandates that the attorney for the Commonwealth must notify U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) if they obtain information indicating that a defendant is not a U.S. citizen or is present in Pennsylvania in violation of immigration laws. This proposed legislation seeks to establish a clearer framework for how citizenship status is handled in the context of criminal law, with the goal of enhancing the enforcement of immigration laws during judicial proceedings.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HB2228 appears to be mixed, with strong support from certain legislators and community groups advocating for strict enforcement of immigration laws. Supporters believe that this will create accountability and streamline proceedings involving non-citizen defendants. Conversely, there are concerns from civil rights advocates and immigrant support networks who view the bill as potentially harmful. Critics argue it could lead to further criminalization of undocumented immigrants and create fear within immigrant communities, discouraging individuals from reporting crimes or seeking assistance from law enforcement.

Contention

Notable points of contention include the implications for local communities and the separation of immigration enforcement from criminal justice processes. Opponents believe this bill may undermine trust between immigrant communities and law enforcement, as individuals may hesitate to report crimes or cooperate with investigations for fear of deportation. Proponents assert that ensuring adherence to immigration laws during criminal proceedings is essential and argue that failing to address citizenship status undermines the integrity of the judicial system.