Pennsylvania House Bill HB2381

Pennsylvania 2023-2024 Regular Session

• Introduced: 6/4/24
• Refer: 6/4/24
• Refer: 6/12/24
• Report Pass: 6/25/24
• Refer: 6/25/24
• Report Pass: 6/26/24
• Engrossed: 6/26/24
• Refer: 7/12/24
• Refer: 9/18/24
• Report Pass: 9/30/24
• Refer: 10/9/24
• Report Pass: 10/21/24
• Enrolled: 10/23/24
• Chaptered: 10/29/24
• Passed: 10/29/24

Caption

In powers and duties, providing for temporary rulemaking authority.

Impact

The bill enables licensing boards to adopt temporary regulations without adhering to some existing legislative requirements, specifically sections of the Commonwealth Documents Law and the Regulatory Review Act. This flexibility is set to facilitate quicker regulatory responses to interstate compacts, which can be crucial for professions requiring cross-border licensing. As a result, it could enhance accessibility of services for residents while broadening the workplace options for licensed professionals in Pennsylvania.

Summary

House Bill 2381 aims to amend Title 63 of the Pennsylvania Consolidated Statutes by providing a framework for temporary rulemaking authority for licensing boards and commissions that fall under interstate licensure compact acts. The bill emphasizes streamlined regulatory practices allowing for the prompt implementation of licensure compacts by permitting boards to create one-time temporary regulations necessary for their enactment. This initiative is positioned as a means to promote cooperation among states while maintaining the integrity of professional licensure standards across state lines.

Sentiment

Sentiment around HB 2381 appears to be generally supportive among legislators who recognize the importance of adapting state regulatory frameworks to meet the evolving needs of the workforce and intergovernmental agreements. Proponents argue that the bill fosters collaboration among states and can help address licensing shortages in various professions, particularly as demand fluctuates due to economic or demographic changes.

Contention

Notable points of contention regarding the bill might arise from concerns over the potential for regulatory overreach or insufficient public oversight in the promulgation of temporary regulations. Critics of broad temporary rulemaking powers typically argue that they could undermine due process and allow for rapid changes that may not always prioritize consumer safety and professional standards. However, the bill addresses these concerns by specifying a defined expiration period for any temporary regulations issued—a safeguard to ensure that these regulations cannot become permanent without undergoing the full legislative process.