Pennsylvania Senate Bill SB1300

Pennsylvania 2023-2024 Regular Session

• Introduced: 7/25/24
• Refer: 7/25/24
• Refer: 10/8/24
• Report Pass: 10/8/24
• Engrossed: 10/8/24
• Refer: 10/9/24

Caption

In matters affecting government units, further providing for limitations on damages relating to actions against Commonwealth parties and for limitations on damages relating to actions against local parties.

Impact

This bill represents a significant change in state law concerning how damages are calculated and awarded in lawsuits against government entities. By capping damage awards, proponents believe it will protect taxpayers by limiting the financial exposure of local governments and the Commonwealth. It aims to create clarity and predictability in civil litigation involving governmental parties and mitigate the risk of large financial settlements that can impact municipal budgets and resources.

Summary

Senate Bill 1300 seeks to amend Title 42 of the Pennsylvania Consolidated Statutes, focusing on limitations on damages in actions against Commonwealth and local parties. It proposes that damages arising from the same cause of action or transaction shall not exceed $250,000 per plaintiff or $1,000,000 in the aggregate, with specific provisions for cases involving permanent dismemberment or death allowing damages up to $1,000,000 per plaintiff and $2,000,000 in total. Additionally, any insurance benefits received by claimants would be deducted from recoverable damages.

Sentiment

The sentiment around SB 1300 appears to be mixed. Supporters argue that it is a necessary reform to prevent excessive financial liabilities for government units, which can hinder their ability to serve the public effectively. On the other hand, critics see it as a restriction on the rights of individuals to seek fair compensation, particularly in cases of serious injury or death. As a result, discussions have centered around the balance between protecting government resources and ensuring justice for injured parties.

Contention

Notable points of contention include the perceived fairness of imposing such caps on damage awards, with arguments from opponents who claim it disproportionately affects those with legitimate claims against powerful government entities. The discussion emphasizes concerns about accountability and the ability of individuals to seek adequate remedy for their injuries, particularly in cases where government negligence is involved. If passed, SB 1300 may ignite further debate about reforms in tort law and government accountability.