Pennsylvania Senate Bill SB155

Pennsylvania 2023-2024 Regular Session

• Introduced: 1/9/23
• Refer: 1/9/23
• Refer: 9/30/24
• Report Pass: 10/1/24
• Engrossed: 10/1/24
• Refer: 10/2/24
• Refer: 10/22/24
• Report Pass: 10/23/24
• Refer: 10/23/24
• Report Pass: 11/13/24
• Enrolled: 11/13/24
• Chaptered: 11/18/24
• Passed: 11/18/24

Caption

Further providing for definitions, for repair obligations, for manufacturer's duty for refund or replacement and for presumption of a reasonable number of attempts.

Impact

The implications of SB155 include an expanded framework that manufacturers must adhere to when faced with complaints about vehicle nonconformities. The bill stipulates that manufacturers must repair or replace defective vehicles after a reasonable number of attempts, with explicit provisions regarding the duty to refund or replace vehicles if repairs are unsuccessful. By establishing these clearer guidelines, the bill seeks to hold manufacturers accountable and ensure consumers can secure replacements or refunds more readily when faced with ongoing vehicle issues.

Summary

Senate Bill 155 aims to amend the existing Automobile Lemon Law of Pennsylvania, specifically updating the definitions and clarifying the obligations of manufacturers regarding defective new motor vehicles. The bill expands the definition of 'new motor vehicle' to include more types of vehicles like dual sport motorcycles while setting clear criteria regarding what constitutes a 'nonconformity'. This legislative change is intended to strengthen consumer protections for individuals purchasing or leasing new vehicles that may have defects impairing their safety, use, or value.

Sentiment

General sentiment around the bill appears to be positive with respect to consumer advocacy groups, as it offers increased protections for consumers against defective vehicles. However, it may face opposition from some manufacturers due to potential financial implications and the need for compliance with the more rigorous regulations. Advocates for the bill argue that it is essential for consumer trust in the automobile market, while critics may raise concerns about how these changes could affect smaller manufacturers or lead to increased costs for consumers.

Contention

A notable point of contention surrounding SB155 centers on the balance between consumer protection and the practicality for manufacturers in addressing complaints. Proponents argue that the bill enhances consumer rights and safety, yet opponents may highlight that the expanded definitions and obligations could impose undue burdens on manufacturers, particularly smaller operations. The amendments to the presumption of a reasonable number of attempts to resolve issues may also lead to litigation if disagreements arise over whether a manufacturer has met its obligations appropriately.