Pennsylvania Senate Bill SB382

Pennsylvania 2023-2024 Regular Session

• Introduced: 2/21/23
• Refer: 2/21/23
• Refer: 8/30/23
• Report Pass: 9/18/23
• Engrossed: 9/18/23
• Refer: 9/19/23

Caption

Further providing for definitions and for projects affecting submerged lands of the Commonwealth.

Impact

The impact of SB382 on state laws primarily revolves around its focus on submerged lands, which are critical from both environmental and economic perspectives. By establishing clear definitions, the bill facilitates better oversight and management of these lands, potentially preventing misuse while promoting sustainable development. Additionally, it aligns state regulations with contemporary environmental standards and practices, ensuring that projects involving submerged lands adhere to modern ecological considerations.

Summary

SB382 aims to further define the parameters surrounding projects that affect submerged lands within the Commonwealth. This bill is significant as it seeks to establish clearer definitions and guidelines that govern the utilization and management of state-owned submerged lands. Proponents of the bill argue that such definitions are essential for effective planning and regulation, ensuring that environmental protections are properly upheld while fostering appropriate development in these areas.

Sentiment

Overall, the sentiment surrounding SB382 appears supportive among environmental advocacy groups, who view it as a step forward in responsible land management. They appreciate the efforts to enhance collaboration between state authorities and stakeholders involved in development projects. However, some stakeholders express concerns regarding potential bureaucratic hurdles that may arise from increased regulation, fearing it could hinder timely project approvals in necessary developments.

Contention

One notable point of contention arises from the balance between economic development and environmental protection. While supporters advocate for the meticulous regulation of submerged lands to prevent exploitation, critics argue that overly stringent definitions and regulations could impede beneficial economic projects. The discussions may involve differing opinions on how best to protect these lands while allowing for necessary infrastructural development.