Pennsylvania House Bill HB1163

Pennsylvania 2025-2026 Regular Session

• Introduced: 4/7/25
• Refer: 4/7/25

Caption

In Commonwealth services, providing for work-related hazardous duty.

Impact

The legislation seeks to ensure that employees who are obligated to work through public health crises do not face financial disadvantages due to illness or inability to work. It allows these workers to receive unemployment compensation and workers' compensation without needing to exhaust their paid time off. By supporting this vulnerable workforce, the bill aims to promote job security and economic stability within sectors essential to public health and safety.

Summary

House Bill 1163 proposes amendments to Title 35 (Health and Safety) of the Pennsylvania Consolidated Statutes, specifically addressing protections for employees in life-sustaining businesses or occupations during public health emergencies. The bill establishes a presumption that workers who contract or are exposed to infectious diseases, such as COVID-19, while required to work, will have their medical condition classified as work-related hazardous duty. This measure aims to streamline access to unemployment and workers' compensation benefits for these individuals.

Sentiment

Overall, the sentiment surrounding HB 1163 appears to be positive among supporters who view it as essential for protecting frontline workers during health emergencies. Advocates, including labor representatives and healthcare advocates, argue that the bill will provide necessary safety nets for those who put themselves at risk while serving the community. However, there may also be concerns among some stakeholders about the financial implications for businesses required to implement and comply with these provisions.

Contention

Notable points of contention include discussions regarding the definition and scope of 'life-sustaining businesses' and whether the bill adequately addresses all potential impacts on employers, especially smaller businesses. Critics may argue that the bill could lead to increased costs for businesses and potentially deter hiring in high-risk environments. The bill’s approach to defining infectious diseases may also be debated, especially in the context of future pandemics or health crises.