Pennsylvania House Bill HB1356

Pennsylvania 2025-2026 Regular Session

• Introduced: 4/30/25
• Refer: 4/30/25

Caption

In powers and duties in general, providing for restriction on the use of REAL ID.

Impact

The passage of HB1356 would significantly alter the regulatory framework regarding identification requirements in Pennsylvania. It aims to ensure that access to public services and buildings is not contingent upon the use of REAL ID-compliant IDs, thereby preventing potential barriers for citizens who may not possess such identification. This legislative action would reinforce the state's commitment to accessible governance and ensure that residents can still engage with their government without the constraints imposed by stricter ID requirements.

Summary

House Bill 1356 introduces amendments to the Administrative Code of 1929, specifically addressing the use of REAL ID for accessing public buildings and government services in Pennsylvania. The bill states that neither the Commonwealth nor any of its political subdivisions may require a REAL ID-compliant identification to gain entry into public buildings or to procure government services or forms. Instead, a driver's license or non-driver photo identification from the Commonwealth or any state, among similar identification forms, will suffice.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HB1356 appears to be supportive among advocates for easier access to government services, particularly those concerned about the implications of REAL ID legislation on individuals’ rights and accessibility. Proponents argue that the bill promotes inclusiveness and prevents discrimination against vulnerable populations who might lack compliant identification. Conversely, some may express concern that such changes could complicate identification verification processes or be viewed as a regression in security measures.

Contention

A notable point of contention regarding HB1356 focuses on the balance between security and accessibility. While supporters contend that limiting REAL ID usage facilitates public access and enhances citizen engagement, opponents could argue that it undermines the integrity of identification processes. This debate underscores a broader societal issue of how to manage identification requirements so as to not impede the public's interaction with government while also ensuring adequate security protocols are in place.