Pennsylvania House Bill HB1424

Pennsylvania 2025-2026 Regular Session

• Introduced: 5/7/25
• Refer: 5/7/25
• Refer: 6/23/25
• Report Pass: 7/7/25
• Refer: 7/7/25
• Report Pass: 7/8/25
• Engrossed: 7/8/25
• Refer: 7/23/25

Caption

In local taxes, further providing for delegation of taxing powers and restrictions thereon.

Impact

The impact of HB 1424 on state laws primarily pertains to the clarity it brings to the taxing powers of local governments. By establishing strict guidelines on what taxes can be levied, the bill aims to create a more standardized approach to local taxation, potentially preventing confusion and disputes over local tax authority. However, by restricting certain tax revenues, it may limit the financial flexibility of local governments to address community-specific needs.

Summary

House Bill 1424 proposes amendments to the Local Tax Enabling Act by detailing the delegation of taxing powers and implementing restrictions on local authorities' ability to levy certain taxes. This bill intends to specify that local governments cannot collect taxes on the privilege of operating tangible property that is subject to state taxes, thereby limiting local tax authority on specific properties including recreational properties. It also addresses exceptions related to amusement and admissions taxes, particularly regarding professional sporting events.

Sentiment

The general sentiment surrounding HB 1424 appears to be mixed among lawmakers and local governments. Supporters may argue that the bill is essential for avoiding complications arising from overlapping tax jurisdictions, and that a more unified tax structure will help facilitate compliance and economic development. Conversely, there are concerns from some local officials about the bill's implications for their autonomy and ability to raise revenues tailored to their constituents' needs.

Contention

Notable points of contention regarding HB 1424 focus on its potential encroachment on local governance rights. Critics argue that limiting local authority to impose taxes removes essential revenue options that would allow municipalities to address unique local challenges. The opposition raises valid concerns about the long-term impacts of reduced local funding, especially in urban areas or regions reliant on tourism, where local amusement taxes play a crucial role in budgeting and financing.