Pennsylvania House Bill HB403

Pennsylvania 2025-2026 Regular Session

• Introduced: 1/31/25
• Refer: 1/31/25

Caption

Providing for immigration preemption and cooperation; and establishing the Immigration Cooperation Fund.

Impact

The enactment of HB 403 would alter the relationship between local and state authorities regarding immigration enforcement. Specifically, municipalities would be prohibited from creating or enforcing policies that limit the ability of law enforcement agencies to act on immigration matters. This could lead to a more standardized approach to immigration enforcement statewide, effectively centralizing control with the state authorities and reducing the autonomy of local governments to address immigration issues in ways they see fit. It raises questions about the balance of power between state and local governments in public safety and immigration policy.

Summary

House Bill 403 introduces substantial amendments to Title 29 of the Pennsylvania Consolidated Statutes, aimed at establishing a framework for state-level immigration enforcement. The bill seeks to preempt local municipalities from adopting policies that could obstruct the enforcement of federal immigration laws by law enforcement agencies. It mandates that local law enforcement must cooperate with federal immigration requests, including holding individuals based on federal detainer requests. The bill also establishes the Immigration Cooperation Fund to support local law enforcement agencies in these efforts through state funding and grants.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HB 403 appears to be sharply divided. Proponents, primarily from law enforcement and certain political factions, argue that the bill enhances public safety by allowing for greater enforcement of federal immigration laws and minimizes the perceived risks posed by undocumented individuals. Critics, however, express concerns that it undermines local governance and communities' ability to craft policies that consider the unique needs of their constituents. These opposing views reflect broader national debates about immigration policy and local autonomy.

Contention

A notable point of contention following the bill's introduction is the potential implications for civil rights and local community dynamics. Opponents of HB 403 argue that requiring local cooperation with federal immigration authorities could lead to increased racial profiling and a chilling effect on the willingness of individuals from immigrant communities to engage with local law enforcement. The legal ramifications for municipalities that may wish to contest aspects of the law or those policies seen as overly restrictive on civil liberties also pose significant issues that will inevitably arise should the bill pass.