Pennsylvania House Bill HB436

Pennsylvania 2025-2026 Regular Session

• Introduced: 1/31/25
• Refer: 1/31/25

Caption

In riot, disorderly conduct and related offenses, further providing for prohibition of ownership of certain animals.

Impact

If enacted, HB 436 would modify existing laws by imposing stricter penalties and requirements on individuals convicted of animal neglect or abuse. The bill stipulates that offenders must complete violence prevention counseling, which will be documented and verified before they can regain the right to own animals. This provision is intended to prevent recidivism in animal-related offenses and promote responsible ownership, thereby fostering a safer environment for both animals and the community.

Summary

House Bill 436 seeks to amend Title 18 of the Pennsylvania Consolidated Statutes concerning the prohibition of ownership of certain animals. The bill introduces a mandate that individuals convicted of specific offenses related to animal ownership must undergo violence prevention counseling as a condition of their sentencing. It establishes a minimum period of at least two years during which convicted individuals must be barred from owning, possessing, or caring for animals, thus aiming to enhance public safety and animal welfare by addressing the underlying issues of violence that can manifest in mistreatment of animals.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HB 436 appears to be largely supportive among animal welfare advocates and lawmakers focused on enhancing animal protection laws. Proponents view it as a necessary step to ensure that those who have harmed animals receive appropriate counseling and do not repeat their offenses. However, potential points of contention may arise regarding the feasibility of the counseling requirement and concerns about the rights of individuals regarding their ability to own animals post-conviction.

Contention

Notable points of contention may include debates over the effectiveness and implementation of the mandated violence prevention counseling. Some critics may express concerns about whether such counseling will truly address the root causes of animal abuse or merely add another layer of regulation. Additionally, questions about the proposed penalties and the discretion given to authorities in enforcing compliance with the animal ownership ban could generate discussions during legislative deliberations.