Pennsylvania House Bill HB529

Pennsylvania 2025-2026 Regular Session

• Introduced: 2/10/25
• Refer: 2/10/25

Caption

Establishing the Smart Growth Zoning and Housing Program and the Smart Growth Zoning District Fund.

Impact

The bill is designed to address housing shortages by allowing municipalities to create smart growth zoning districts that can support higher-density living arrangements. Municipalities adopting these districts will have access to financial incentives, including density bonus payments for each new housing unit built. The legislation encourages the construction of at least 20% attainable housing within developments of more than 12 units, thus potentially increasing access to affordable housing options for families and individuals across Pennsylvania.

Summary

House Bill 529 establishes a Smart Growth Zoning and Housing Program in Pennsylvania, aimed at promoting sustainable and efficient land use practices through smart growth zoning districts. This legislation significantly amends Title 53 of the Pennsylvania Consolidated Statutes, creating a framework for municipalities to adopt smart growth zoning strategies that encourage the development of attainable housing in eligible areas. The program includes provisions such as zoning incentive payments to municipalities to aid in the development of residential projects that meet specified density and affordability criteria.

Sentiment

Overall sentiment surrounding HB 529 appears to be supportive among proponents of smart growth and housing accessibility. Advocates argue that the bill addresses urgent housing needs and aligns with sustainable development practices. However, concerns may arise from opponents who view increased density and potential changes in land use as threats to local character and community dynamics, suggesting that the bill could lead to overdevelopment in certain areas.

Contention

Notable points of contention include the balance between promoting development and maintaining local community standards. Critics may express worries over the potential for inadequate infrastructure to support increased density, as well as the implications for local governance and zoning authority. Additionally, the requirement for municipalities to provide a certain percentage of attainable housing raises questions about economic feasibility and the readiness of local governments to implement these changes. The legislative discussions are likely to highlight the tension between state-level housing mandates and local autonomy over zoning decisions.