Pennsylvania House Bill HB595

Pennsylvania 2025-2026 Regular Session

• Introduced: 2/12/25
• Refer: 2/12/25

Caption

In public assistance, providing for behavioral health and physical health services integration.

Impact

The bill is expected to significantly reform the existing public assistance framework in Pennsylvania by mandating the integration of care through contracted managed care organizations. This integration is intended to promote a more holistic approach to health care, recognizing the interconnectedness of behavioral and physical health. Additionally, the department is tasked with submitting necessary waivers to federal authorities to facilitate this integration, reflecting a strategic shift towards comprehensive care models that address both health aspects concurrently.

Summary

House Bill 595 aims to integrate behavioral health and physical health services within the HealthChoices medical assistance managed care program in Pennsylvania. This initiative is designed to enhance the delivery of health services for individuals eligible for medical assistance by ensuring that they receive comprehensive and quality care tailored to their specific needs. The integration will cover mental health, addiction services, and physical health services, streamlining care management and improving outcomes for recipients.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HB 595 appears generally supportive among stakeholders who advocate for improved health outcomes and the efficient use of resources in public health programs. Proponents argue that merging behavioral and physical health services will lead to better patient care and outcomes, particularly for those struggling with mental health issues alongside physical health conditions. However, there may also be concerns related to the implementation of such an extensive integration effort, particularly regarding resources and capacity within the managed care organizations involved.

Contention

While the intent behind HB 595 is to foster a more inclusive health care framework, potential points of contention may arise around the execution of the integration process. Questions about the readiness of managed care organizations to handle such integrated services and the implications for service delivery in diverse communities may be raised. Furthermore, the requirement for mandatory participation in managed care programs could lead to concerns about access and quality of care for vulnerable populations, reflecting a need for ongoing dialogue as the bill progresses.