Pennsylvania House Bill HB651

Pennsylvania 2025-2026 Regular Session

• Introduced: 2/20/25
• Refer: 2/20/25

Caption

Further providing for installment payment of taxes.

Impact

The potential impact of HB 651 on state laws is significant, as it provides counties, municipalities, and school districts with the flexibility to structure tax payment plans that better accommodate the financial situations of their residents. By allowing installment payments over a longer term, the bill could reduce the financial burden on taxpayers, potentially decreasing delinquency rates and improving overall compliance with tax payments. This could lead to a more stable revenue stream for local governments, which rely heavily on tax collections for funding essential services.

Summary

House Bill 651 aims to amend the Local Tax Collection Law by expanding the installment payment options available for taxes levied by various taxing districts in Pennsylvania. With the proposed amendment, local governments will have the authority to allow tax payments to be made in up to twelve installments, an increase from the previous limit of four. This measure is seen as a means to make tax payments more manageable for citizens and to provide greater financial flexibility during challenging economic times.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HB 651 appears to be generally favorable, particularly among those who advocate for financial relief measures for taxpayers. Supporters of the bill argue that extending the installment payment option will assist low-income families and individuals facing economic hardship. However, there may be concerns from some local officials about the administrative implications and potential impacts on cash flow for local governments that rely on timely tax revenues.

Contention

Despite its positive framing, HB 651 may face contention regarding the implementation and administrative feasibility of the extended payment schedule. Critics may suggest that local governments could experience challenges in managing and enforcing extended installment agreements, especially if taxpayers fail to adhere to the modified schedules. Additionally, there may be a debate about the potential loss of revenue if the extended payment options lead to revenue delays, thus complicating budgetary planning for local services.