Pennsylvania House Bill HB699

Pennsylvania 2025-2026 Regular Session

• Introduced: 2/21/25
• Refer: 2/21/25

Caption

In powers and duties, providing for double utility poles.

Impact

One significant aspect of HB 699 is the establishment of remedial guidelines and procedures to facilitate the timely removal of these poles, including penalties for infrastructure owners who fail to comply. The bill requires the Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission to begin rulemaking within a specified time frame to implement the necessary regulations. This includes establishing a reasonable period for infrastructure owners to migrate their facilities to newly installed poles and defining the process for compensation relating to the removal of abandoned infrastructure. Such measures aim to enhance the infrastructure landscape while prioritizing public safety and operational efficiency.

Summary

House Bill 699 is a legislative proposal designed to address the management and regulation of double utility poles in Pennsylvania. The bill introduces amendments to Title 66 of the Pennsylvania Consolidated Statutes concerning the powers and duties related to public utilities. The main purpose of the bill is to reduce the long-term presence of double utility poles on public rights-of-way, which are seen as operational necessities but are not favored due to various concerns, including public safety, efficiency in the use of public easements, and the aesthetics of the streetscape.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HB 699 appears largely positive among proponents who advocate for improved safety and aesthetics in public space. Supporters argue that the timely removal of double poles can enhance the overall visual appeal of neighborhoods and minimize hazards. However, potential concerns have been raised regarding the implementation of the bill, particularly in terms of the timing and costs associated with the mandated removal and relocation processes for utility infrastructure.

Contention

Notable points of contention regarding HB 699 focus on the exact timeline and burden of compliance placed on utility companies and attached infrastructure owners. The proposed civil penalties for non-compliance have sparked debates about their fairness and necessity. Additionally, the bill's provisions concerning the jurisdiction of the Public Utility Commission over these matters may raise concerns among stakeholders regarding the control and oversight of local utility operations.