Pennsylvania House Bill HB772

Pennsylvania 2025-2026 Regular Session

• Introduced: 3/3/25
• Refer: 3/3/25

Caption

In pupils and attendance, further providing for suspension and expulsion of pupils.

Impact

The implications of HB 772 include a significant shift in how suspensions and expulsions are handled in public schools. By creating stricter criteria for suspending younger pupils, the bill aims to reduce the number of suspensions and expulsions in early education settings. This is likely to change disciplinary practices within schools, pushing institutions to find alternative measures to address minor misconduct rather than resorting to suspensions, particularly for younger students. Such measures could foster a more inclusive educational environment that prioritizes support over punishment, especially for vulnerable populations.

Summary

House Bill 772 seeks to amend the Public School Code of 1949 in Pennsylvania, specifically regarding the suspension and expulsion of pupils. This bill lays out provisions for the temporary suspension of students by principals or teachers for misconduct and defines the process that school boards must follow for longer suspensions or expulsions. Under the new provisions, students under the age of eight can only be suspended or expelled if they pose an imminent threat of harm. This adds a layer of protection for younger students, reflecting a growing recognition of the developmental differences in early childhood education.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HB 772 appears supportive among education reform advocates who emphasize the need for fair and developmentally appropriate disciplinary practices. They argue that the changes in this bill could lead to improved student outcomes, as it allows for behavioral interventions rather than punitive measures. However, some educators and administrators may express concern regarding the challenges of implementing these new standards effectively, particularly in managing student behavior without traditional disciplinary methods.

Contention

Notable points of contention may arise from the interpretation and application of the new suspension rules, particularly regarding what constitutes an 'imminent threat.' While the bill aims to protect younger students from exclusionary practices, it places additional responsibilities on school administrators to conduct proper hearings for longer suspensions. This may raise concerns about how to balance student safety with educational access and the potential administrative burden on schools to navigate the new procedures.