Pennsylvania House Bill HB858

Pennsylvania 2025-2026 Regular Session

• Introduced: 3/11/25
• Refer: 3/11/25
• Refer: 6/2/25
• Report Pass: 6/3/25
• Engrossed: 6/3/25
• Refer: 6/9/25

Caption

Providing for county property contact information list; imposing duties on chief assessor; and providing for penalties.

Impact

If passed, HB 858 will significantly alter how property information is managed at the county level. It introduces formal requirements for property owners to submit accurate contact details, thereby enhancing accountability and increasing the capacity for municipalities to enforce local codes effectively. This measure is aimed at improving the response times and actions taken by property owners in cases of violations, potentially leading to better-maintained properties and improved community standards. The act would take effect 60 days after enactment, giving property owners time to adjust to these new obligations.

Summary

House Bill 858 focuses on establishing a county property contact information list by amending Title 68 of the Pennsylvania Consolidated Statutes. The bill requires property owners, including individuals and businesses, to provide contact information for individuals responsible for maintaining or remedying issues related to their properties. This list is maintained by a chief assessor and is intended to facilitate communication between municipalities and property owners regarding property maintenance and municipal code violations. Failure to comply with these requirements may result in penalties, including fines for providing false information or not updating contact details as required.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HB 858 appears to be supportive, particularly among legislators and local government representatives who see value in improved communication and accountability in property management. However, there may be concerns from property owners about the burdensome nature of the requirements, especially regarding penalties for non-compliance. Nevertheless, proponents argue that these measures are necessary to maintain the integrity of property management and uphold local regulations.

Contention

The primary contention over HB 858 revolves around the implications of increased oversight and the penalties imposed for non-compliance. While supporters advocate for enhanced communication and better property management, opponents may contend that the bill imposes undue regulatory burdens on property owners, especially smaller landowners or those who may struggle with the administrative aspects of compliance. The exemption of owner-occupied properties suggests some recognition of this concern, but significant discussions may arise regarding how these regulations are enforced and their potential impact on property rights.